Craig Weiler
Associate
He based this on an extremely flawed criteria as I just described. it is not a valid conclusion.
What spin? I have to cut this quote mid-paragraph because you say there is a spin, suggesting explicitly that Sheldrake is the one being dishonest. I have looked at the actual data and Sheldrake is right.
You cant just say that it was sheldrake and proponents that put a spin on it without being specific. Vague criticisms are not valid.
From the data on the dog experiment it is quite clear that Wiseman is guilty of shenanigans.
Parapsychologists have been responding to VALID criticisms for many decades. The evolution of analysis and experiments makes this pretty clear.
Hi Neil,
Linda has been down this road before on the Sheldrake/dog experiment and has demonstrated that she is immune to reason and evidence. You're wasting your time conversing with her.