SciFiFanatic101
New
For the past 2 months or so I've been following with interest the skeptic\believer discussion and just now I came up with two terms that are relevant in this matter.
Scientistically correct-a set of ideas/theories/hypotheses/discussions that are deemed acceptable discourse by the scientific community and academia and are in accord with the current materialistic paradigm(eg. evolutionary theory,big bang theory,brain-based consciousness,illusion of free will,selfish gene hypothesis etc.)
Scientistically incorrect-a set of ideas/theories/experiences/discussions that are deemed unacceptable discourse by the scientific community and academia, that may cause career suicide(when working in a scientific establishment or academia) or ridicule by skeptic organizations/media and are in conflict with the current materialistic paradigm(NDE research,ESP research,ufology,more specifically alien abduction and contactee experiences)
Do these terms make any sense to you?
Scientistically correct-a set of ideas/theories/hypotheses/discussions that are deemed acceptable discourse by the scientific community and academia and are in accord with the current materialistic paradigm(eg. evolutionary theory,big bang theory,brain-based consciousness,illusion of free will,selfish gene hypothesis etc.)
Scientistically incorrect-a set of ideas/theories/experiences/discussions that are deemed unacceptable discourse by the scientific community and academia, that may cause career suicide(when working in a scientific establishment or academia) or ridicule by skeptic organizations/media and are in conflict with the current materialistic paradigm(NDE research,ESP research,ufology,more specifically alien abduction and contactee experiences)
Do these terms make any sense to you?