But they did. Bush ran on an anti-war platform and promised we would stop being the world's police force. People were fed up with Clintons thugging around in the Balkans and Sudan. PNAC, the Project for the New American Century, a Neocon think tank publication published just prior to 9/11 specifically stated that a "catalyzing event" a "new Pearl Harbor" was necessary in order to gain popular support for the continued projection of military power abroad.
Tenants of WTC 1 and 2 reported having numerous power outages in the weeks before 9/11 and reported loud construction noises particularly on the reinforced service floors, they reported seeing workers with large spools of cable coming in reportedly running new network cable throughout the entire building. A renovation of the elevators was done months prior and access to the elevator shaft would be necessary for rigging. Also new fireproofing was sprayed on the beams. All of this could have allowed access to critical structure and it is possible the fire-proofing they sprayed on was actually thermitic paint. We can't know for sure with out a real investigation, but there were multiple opportunities for rigging under these various cover projects. The buildings needed to be demolished anyways. They were outdated, struggling to keep tenants, and full of asbestos insulation that would have been enormously expensive to remedy
As for WTC7, tenants included the SEC and CIA so you probably wouldn't hear anything from them.
I'm not sure what that has to do with anything?
...People on the CIA payroll. We created Al-Qaeda. Osama was a paid and trained CIA asset. This is all well known. We had numerous opportunities to take him out and never did. He was in a hospital in Dubai on dialysis for failing kidneys in July 2001 where he was visited by the local CIA station chief. The hijackers originated from our wahabist ally and terrorist training center, Saudi Arabia, and were funded through the Saudi Ambassador, Bandar "Bush" nicknamed for his ultra close relationship with George. The Bush family was also business partners with the bin Laden family through the Carlisle group. This is why the 9/11 commission was discouraged from investigating the funding sources of the hijackers and only 29 pages were devoted to that subject which were formerly classified.
Secret societies have always existed and have had prominent influence on the power plays around the world for ages. They have at times preserved knowledge and uplifted humanity. At times they have been sources of oppression. I think in most of them their core goals are noble: to initiate a person into the topics and philosophies we're interested in here at Skeptiko and to create the conditions for a person to have a mystical transformative experience in which one becomes the master of his own consciousness and then to go on and shape the evolution of the consciousness of humanity as a whole.
The problem with some secret societies is in their hierarchical nature and their networks with power. Power and hierarchy always filter psychopaths to the top. So in time, secret societies, like governments or religions of any other hierarchical organization become corrupt. The illuminati was apparently a thread of corrupt nihilist psychos who intended to infiltrate the Freemasons and other organizations taking them over and using the networks for nefarious purposes.
Judaism and Zionism are tied in to this for various reasons. Inherent in Judaism is the idea that Jews are racially superior to the Goyim (Gentiles) and God has promised that the other nations will serve them. Modern Christianity has spiritualized and allegorized the racism, xenophobia, and genocide in the OT, and so does not view these elements of Jewish ideology as threatening. Modern Judaism is more of an allegiance to a race of people than to a deity and his commands.
I must stress that there are good and bad aspects of all religions including Judaism and obviously many Jews are good people. All religions typically provided some spiritual help the common man while their hierarchical nature necessitates that a few psychos will rise to the top and use the same religion or its name to oppress and exercise power.
So I have nothing against Jewish people in general. In fact my dad recently converted to Judaism from Christianity and in some ways I think it's been really good for him.
One cannot really talk openly about the Jewish element of nefarious globalism because a mass brainwashing has succeeded in programming people to react emotionally against any criticism of Judaism. All critical thought is immediately shut down with cries of "anti-Semite!" and "holocaust denier!" and "Hitler!" Also, it is generally not productive to attack the globalists on an underlying Jewish ideology as they can use this to superficially divide people along race. Those who get wise to the Jewish role in globalism are steered into other racist organizations like white nationalists or Neo-nazis or merely associated with them to discredit them. Look at the hell they've put Mel Gibson through. Martin Luther, founder of Protestantism was also strongly anti-Jewish. Some authors of the New Testament were anti-Jewish.
It is much more effective in my opinion to ignore the fact that a great many of the leading globalists and power players are Jews and focus on discrediting their globalist policies and eugenics ideology.
There is a lot of ancient esoteric wisdom hidden in Judaism and many traditions draw from it so it would be foolish to have a flat one-sided view of Judaism based on the actions of elite Jews.
It seems that another reason Jews became heavily associated with finance and the quest for global domination is that the Talmud permitted them to lend with interest (usury) to "the Goyim". Meanwhile Christianity forbade the practice of usury to anyone. So the Jews happily met the demand for credit thereby enriching their families in Europe and becoming embedded in banking and finance.
So it is not a monolithic system, but a network of systems along with regular self-interest in which various ideologies including nihilism, materialism, and Zionist Judaism feature prominently.
All three Abrahamic Faiths believe that one day their Christ or Meshiach or Mahdi will rule the world while the outsiders or those who refuse to worship will be ruled "with a rod of iron". All three Faith's have sects within them that believe this goal is to be acheived by the organized efforts of followers to infiltrate the existing systems of government and finance, and this ideology can be dangerous and oppressive.
The legality is dubious at best. At least in the US the Logan act prevents such secret meetings of state officials.
His novels are closer to reality than you might think.
http://m.strategic-culture.org/news/2012/11/27/a-true-to-life-james-bond-villain.html