Hi manjit
Have you watched the video in question?
If you take all the 'circumstantial' evidence that is shown in it, it is only a small part of all the evidence that made up my mind that there was something smelly around 9/11. These are just a few questions.
Why we're certain people absent from the towers that morning?
Why was such financial interest shown around the towers shortly before the attack?
Why were unusual buying and selling of shares in the airlines involved ?
Why were those Israeli men filming the incident and obviously pleased about it?
Why were the Air Force doing an exercise at that time we'll to the north, making their response weak and in reality useless/incompetent ?
Why was the official report so flawed?
Why did so many witnesses die unexpectedly?
What were the Bin Ladens' interests in the US? Coincidence?
These are just off the top of my head. There are so many others. Some of it I don't go for but other things definitely stink.
It's interesting. It seems to me that once again we are faced with something that many people 'feel' that there is something 'not right' about things. How many times do are these type of things eventually revealed, leaving people saying "I knew there was something about it that wasn't right".
Interesting too, that proponents and skeptics find themselves on opposite where they would normally argue from.
I think that maybe that just a small part of what is being questioned will turn something up, but something apart from the three thousand or more victims has definitely died among the evidence, the stench is unmistakeable.
Hey Steve - first off, I feel it inappropriate to continue this discussion in this thread a wee bit! So I'll make this my last response on it!
And, I'm not really inclined to defend what I'm saying here (which I strongly believe is being misunderstood, deeply, by several people here....as is revealed in claims of not being open minded, objective, "certain of the non-existence of conspiracies" - which Sci accused me of, I despair of ever effectively communicating what I'm saying if even he is misunderstanding me!! - these are all quite, quite contrary to who I am. And anybody who knows me, knows that. As mentioned before, I knew most of the elements of the 9/11 conspiracy before 99.9% of it's proponents today.
Which brings me back to your list - sorry dude, there are indeed very simple & obvious answers to all of those lines of query (which, for me, very, very strongly re-inforces the complete lack of substance to the claims!), and NONE of them bring us back to the ideas that a) Osama and al qaeda had nothing to do with it (I made an astonishing prediction back in 1998 then - I actually predicted a conspiracy theory!), b) that no planes with passengers flew into the towers or c) explosives were planted in and caused the destruction of the 2 towers.
There is absolutely nothing which even remotely suggests any of the 3 specific conspiracy theorist claims are "fact", or even likely. Sorry, I just don't see it. But that's not a problem, we're all different.
I just find the claims of not being "objective" or "open-minded" if you disagree or a conspiracy being "obvious" particularly, well, errm, delusional really (not you specifically btw). That's NOT open-mindedness, that's dogmatic.
I also think the mind-frame within which these kind of profoundly unlikely conspiratorial aspects are considered "obvious" is extremely detrimental to genuine "spiritual" experiences and growth. But hey ho, what do I know, and why should anyone listen to anything I've got to say!! I'm a pretty clueless kind of person.
All the best my friend!:)