You're right. I must have mixed the too together. Although I am certain Tyson quoted him at some point in a tweet. Can't find it.
Same difference though.
As far as the aggression? Laughable considering the bullshit we've had to put up with Skeptics on this site. If you don't like my style...
I am not about to do your homework for you Neil. I am retired. If you don't believe me then that's your problem not mine.
No it doesn't. You're right. But on the other hand, some of the best philosophers were also scientists.
I like the show. Obviously they have to cater to a general audience but the production values are very good. Acting is
really good. And I like they way they approach the psi material. Tough but fair. I wouldn't be surprised if some of the
material they are using came from actual cases...
Yeah it's called Google. Try it some time.
Many philosophers have also been scientists. Take William James for example. Ever walk around Harvard? One of the buildings there has his name on it.
Sadly, a priori bias which without fail leads dogmatic skeptics like you Paul to always assume there must be something wrong with the experimental protocols and analysis is to any intelligent scientist: superficial. It is a tired worn out skeptical argument that has become like the boy who...
It is sad to see skeptics continue to advocate the physicalist model after decades of scientific research in quantum physics. Modern physicists have established scientifically there is no physical object present unless an observation takes place. There is no reality that exists independent of...
Really? Please explain. In what fashion is consciousness "exactly like computation is a trick of electrical activity."
And please be more specific than: "duhhh ... I see the neurons firing therefore that must be consciousness."
Honesty? What does a Skeptic know about honesty? Arouet spews out his dishonest nonsense, and once he reaches a certain point, refuses to acknowledge valid responses. Same MO of Michael Shermer with Sheldrake.
The same Skeptic stink and same odorous lack of intellectual integrity.
Over time they really do wear you out. And you begin to realize you're simply engaged with a fruitless argument with fundamentalists who are so dogmatically entrenched in their materialism, nothing will break their faith. You could quote some of the best scientists who walked the planet...
Yes I think there comes a point where what is being engaged here can be summed up as trolling by remarkably arrogant, unethical Skeptics. They should be relegated to one forum and there should be signs all over the place for new users: HERE BE SKEPTIC TROLLS. Post at your own risk. And...
Coming from a guy who not once, but twice agreed to have a discussion about a seminal book in parapsychology and both times, made it perfectly clear he would not follow through on his agreement. A guy who has not apparently visited a valid medium and repeatedly on these forums has demonstrated...