Search results

I thought so indeed. Instead of acknowledging one's mistakes or bad attitude /tone , one prefers to display utter denial dressed up in meaningless semantics.Too bad. The man was just projecting maybe. Freud was right about that much at least. Instead of discussing the subject matter of this...

Science is not a matter of opinion indeed , in principle at least. But , i am not claiming that a-priori held subjective beliefs or world views do play no role in science , on the contrary. Major proof ? : materialism as a world view , a belief , a 19th century outdated false and superseded...

I know that mainstream materialist science has been ignoring or denying a lots of empirical evidence as such , simply because it lies outside or challenges the supremacy of the materialist meta-paradigm in current science , but that's no reason to whine and complain about that : " Evidence is...

Well, hard evidence is the only way to defeat materialists.Whining or playing the victim role would only help their already lost "case or cause ". The fact that materialism is false does not mean that all non-materialist claims are correct. The latter should be supported by hard empirical evidence.

The best way to debunk materialism is through providing waterproof or strong empirical evidence the validity of which materialists cannot deny as such, i presume.Good luck .Cheers.

Indeed.There is nothing rational about the so-called rationalwiki anyway. Whatever or whoever would challenge or go beyond materialism is ,by definition, pseudo-scientifc , according to that silly materialist source. It's about time that non-materialist science takes the "offensive" by debunking...

Sure.That's what i implied above. Problem is : mainstream science has been materialist since the second half of the 19th century at least and counting. Worse : materialism has been taken for granted as science or as the scientific world view by the majority of scientists and other people , all...

Look, my friend : nobody said anything about any alleged animal capacity to transcend its physical dimension. In short : it all comes down to the consciousness hard problem in science. That's the key to understanding the issue of man's unparalleled uniqueness and specialness. If one would assume...

Yeah, indeed , the video , not the forum. Well, no wonder that science has been underestimating , so to speak, the power of the human mind over the body ,since science has been materialist ,and hence has been assuming that the mind is just brain activity or the product of the brain without any...

Later, folks. I am really busy and i am not allowed to post relevant links yet either,sorry.Thank you for all your interesting replies. Tomorrow is another day ."Like me " then lol to help me be able to post links ....Take care.

Indeed.But science is , in principle at least , not a matter of opinion , otherwise we would have as many "sciences " as there are human beings on this planet .That would be no science, even though QM has been showing to all of us that "objective " science is a myth , which means that there is...

Yes, no one knows yet how placebo works exactly , if ever , but , one does know that it does work through the power of belief in it.Placebo does work even in surgery sometimes.The power of belief through the human mind is amazing. Take a look at the following work of some scientists who tried to...

The interpretation problem of QM is another separate issue.

This is not a matter of opinion.Science is not .

I am relatively sure about what science is and what science is not : homeopathy is not science .See Karl Popper on the subject , for example. I don't have time now to elaborate on that , as i am still not allowed to post links,so.sorry.

Homeopathy is pseudo-science :

What ? You don't know how placebo works ? really ? By believing it would .By taking it for granted as the real thing, while placebo does in fact nothing : wouldn't work if one would not believe it would.

It works like placebo does , that is . That does not make it correct indeed.

That's new -age non-sense , my friend, sorry. Pseudo-science at best. Reductionist materialism is certainly false , but the above is no less false.

Of course they have .They are conscious too, so .