I have no idea what the greater project of this forum is. It might be world peace or a commercial venture, but I observe some traits people need to overcome if it's to move forward. First, there are no clear conclusions to be drawn from any of the evidence on psi. Some of it is suggestive, but nothing I'd put the house on. Second there's an Orwellian double speak to some of the contributions, with thought crime lurking just beneath; so God = bad, higher self = good. Christ = error, Christ consciousness = correct. It's insulting in a number of ways, it excludes a lot of intelligent scientific thinkers from a valid role (and I suggest people Google scientists who are Christians and believers in God who are scientists to see their contributions) especially when it replaces intellectual and philosophical rigour with sentimentality and vagueness. It also pushes people like myself who have no interest in expounding our personal convictions into time-wasting, defensive postures, just to stay above the tide of misrepresentation and new age waffle. I use new age pejoratively, because behind the wall of inclusion and be-nice there's some really bad philosophy and slack conclusions.
Forums are made up of the contributors and there are some seriously bright, well read people on Skeptiko and a lot of good will, but at the end of the day Von Daniken and Aquinas, Icke and Kastrup aren't equal, and no amount of feel good rhetoric will make them so.