A Theory of Everything

#1
Magister colin leslie dean A Theory of everything "all products of human thought end in meaninglessness"
"[Deans] philosophy is the sickest, most paralyzing and most destructive thing that has ever originated from the brain of man."
"[Dean] lay waste to everything in its path... [It is ] a systematic work of destruction and demoralization... In the end it became nothing but an act of sacrilege."
It seems to be the case that for all people a theory of everything would mean that all the sciences would be explained by a one theory
That out of the theory of everything relativity and quantum mechanics would be lets say special cases flowing out of the theory of everything
Also all the sciences would be just special cases flowing out of the theory of everything Now whether this will happen what is for sure is Magister colin leslie dean has a theory of everything; not a theory of everything from which all sciences flow out of;but a theory of everything nevertheless
And that theory of everything is "A philosophy to dangerous to acknowledge" which is "all products of human thought end in meaninglessness" mathematics science philosophy ie nihilism post-modernism etc; even the theory of everything from which all science flows out of itself will end in meaninglessness-everything ends in meaninglessness

Magister dean show mathematics ends in meaninglessness

because

it is proven

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/All-things-are-possible.pdf

or

https://www.scribd.com/document/324037705/All-Things-Are-Possible-philosophy

an integer 1= a non-integer 0.999... thus mathematics ends in contradiction

what does this notation mean
0.888...
and
0.999....
and why you are at it
integer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integer
"An integer (from the Latin integer meaning "whole")[note 1] is a number that can be written without a fractional component. For example, 21, 4, 0, and −2048 are integers, while 9.75, 5+1/2, and √2 are not.
The set of integers consists of zero (0), the positive natural numbers (1, 2, 3, ...), also called whole numbers or counting numbers"
1 is an integer
0.888.. is not an integer
0.999.. is not an integer
thus when an integer 1= a non-integer 0.999.. maths ends in contradiction


In DeLillo's Cosmopolis [a character] says, “What a culture does is absorb and neutralize its adversaries.” If you’re a writer who, one way or another, comes to be seen as dangerous, you’ll wake up one morning and discover your face on a coffee mug or a t-shirt and you’ll have been neutralized Capitalist culture neutralizes anything dangerous, anything that might threaten the consumer society.
but
this philosophy of Magister colin leslie dean regarding the meaninglessness of mathematics and science cannot be acknowledged as it destroys the system that tries to acknowledge it In other words to turn deans views into a commodity infact advertises the very thing a science based society does not want ie advertising its meaninglessness - it destroys science itself by the very fact of acknowledging it
these case studies that that prove mathematics/science end in meaninglessness: prove nihilism:all products of human thought end in meaninglessness by Magister colin leslie dean the only modern Renaissance man with 9 degrees including 4 masters: B,Sc, BA, B.Litt(Hons), MA, B.Litt(Hons), MA, MA (Psychoanalytic studies), Master of Psychoanalytic studies, Grad Cert (Literary studies) : who proved Godels theorems to be invalid
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/GODEL5.pdf
or
https://www.scribd.com/document/32970323/Godels-incompleteness-theorem-invalid-illegitimate

Also dean shows Schrödinger's cat thought experiment is meaningless as he cant tell us what dead is what alive is

Now as dean points out, if some bright spark wants to tell us what according to them, not Schrodinger, dead is what alive is
then
in the process tell us your religion your culture your philosophy your spirituality your science behind what dead is what alive is
and if you go to science for your definition of life
bear in mind we are told by science
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life
"Biology is the science concerned with the study of life."
but
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life
"There is currently no consensus regarding the definition of life"
so basically
without science knowing what life is
then dead and alive have no meaning
biology science dont even know what life is-how ironic they study life but dont know what life is
that is why biology is not a science
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/Bbiology-is-not-a-science.pdf
Aside dont you think it strange that after say 85 years none of the worlds greatest geniuses have bothered to ask what Schrodinger means by dead means by alive or the geniuses ask does dead mean? what does alive mean? -this is the power of consensus trance
consensus trance
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Consensus_trance
this meaninglessness of Schrodinger's thought experiment is one proof of the view that all products of human thought end in meaninglessness ie mathematics and science
Colin leslie dean is also Australia's leading erotic poet
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/book-genre/poetry/
or
https://www.scribd.com/document/35520015/List-of-FREE-Erotic-Poetry-Books-by-Gamahucher-Press

Colin leslie dean argues all products of human thought end in meaninglessness
examples/case studies

1)Mathematics/science ends in contradiction:an integer=a non-integer
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/All-things-are-possible.pdf
or
https://www.scribd.com/document/324037705/All-Things-Are-Possible-philosophy
2)Mathematics ends in contradiction:6 examples example 1 it is proven 1+1=1
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/MATHEMATICS.pdf
or
https://www.scribd.com/document/40697621/Mathematics-Ends-in-Meaninglessness-ie-self-contradiction
all very simple and clear
the facts are
1) it is proven an integer = a non-integer
1 is a finite number it stops
A finite decimal is one that stops, like 0.157
A non-finite decimal like 0.888... does not stop
A non-finite decimal like 0.999... does not stop
when a finite number 1 = a non-finite number 0.999.. then maths ends in contradiction
another way
1 is an integer a whole number
0.888... is a non-integer it is not a whole number
0.999... is a non-integer not a whole number
when a integer 1 =a non-integer 0.999... maths ends in contradiction


1)Darwins book is called On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection ....
but
this paper shows natural selection is not the origin of new species Natural selection is not the origin of new species
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/books/philosophy/Natural_selection.pdf
"Natural selection does not generate new genes/species Natural selection adds no new genetic information as it only deals with the passing on of genes/traits already present and it will be pointed out genetics cannot account for the generation of new species/genes as it is claimed the generation of new genes [via mutation] is a random process due to radiation, viruses, chemicals etc and genetic cannot account for these process happening as they are out side the scope of genetics physics, chaos theory etc may give some explanation but genetics cant"

2) Biologist cant tell us what a species is -without contradiction thus evolution theory ie evolving species is nonsense
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/BIOLOGISTS-DON.pdf
Biologists agree there is species hybridization
but that contradicts what a species is

3) biologist tell us they investigate life
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/Bbiology-is-not-a-science.pdf
but
they cant tell us what life is-they can tell us what life does but cant tell us what life is they cant even give a definition of life that is not nonsense
You can prove Nihilism is objectively true
Magister colin leslie dean the only modern Renaissance man
HAS SHOWN
First you can prove by logic all products of human thinking end in meaningless
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/All-things-are-possible.pdf
Now natural language is inconsistent “now it is clear from the work of Tarski that the language of everyday speech is” semantically closed” and hence inconsistent”"
thus
"Now with the inconsistency of language all possible views and their negation are now possible"
"Each view contains within it its negation as all views end in meaninglessness"
Second you can then prove using that logic that the logic you use ends in paradox
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/logiccentrismbook.pdf
"Aristotelian logic as an epistemic condition of truth, the grand narrative of western philosophy: logic-centrism, the limitations of Aristotelian logic, the end of Aristotelian logic, logic/essence and language lead to the meaningless of all views"
 
Last edited:
Top