Documentary looks at old and new models of human consciousness |305|

Discussion in 'Skeptiko Shows' started by Alex, Feb 16, 2016.

  1. I think all the process philosophy stuff has consciousness on the human level as something real, but the world retains its reality as well? So Whitehead, Bergson, Gregg Rosenberg. That said everything has objective/subjective poles.

    Same would then go for the other panpsychic stuff, for similar reasoning about intrinsic/extrinsic aspects, also the Neutral Monisms that don't fall under Nondualism. (For example Pauli's ideas of matter/mind as two aspects of one whole.)

    The dualist philosophies also don't have consciousness as some kind of illusion, nor is the world illusion AFAIK?

    Information based metaphysics, depending on how the respective authors think it works? Though I guess if everything is information space-time is kind of an illusion? *shrugs*
     
  2. On new guys that need to be included in these docs/interviews, I'd like to see Marcus Arvan get a chance to shine.

    How the Peer-to-Peer Simulation Hypothesis Explains Just About Everything, Including the Very Existence of Quantum Mechanics

     
  3. Small Dog

    Small Dog New

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2016
    Messages:
    226
    I am with Susan Blackmore on the issue of self as an illusion. Buddha taught this many years ago, nad it was confirmed by many people who observed their minds for long enough. There are numerous experiments that confirm that. And yes, there is no reincarnation, because there is nothing to be reincarnated. More than that, nothing dies, because nothing was ever born.

    There is a nice illustration in the latest novel by a Russian author Victor Pelevin. The main character is shown a computer game which has a picture of a cave on the screen. You press the forward button and the cave is moving towards you, as if you are walking forward. This visual demonstrates how the mind works. The cave does not exist, except in the code that generates the picture. Only a small part of it, a snapshot, exists at any given time. Yet you can mark the place and after a few turns come back to it some time later.

    This is how we see the world, and this is how self is gradually built: by moving through connected and unconnected events and building the narrative, the mental matrix of who we are. If you look carefully, this self consists of multiple personalities that replace each other every few minutes. And each of these personalities is a machine that will act predictably in typical situations. In the morning you make the promise of not eating fast food, but by lunch time you're sitting with the Big Mac and a pack of French Fries. Was it the same person who made these decisions? Or, one moment you're kind and patient, but should your blood sugar level drop and a different chain of chemical and hormonal relays turns you into an irritable and aggressive wanker - which you will realize later and, again, deeply regret! That's free will for you. The only way to see the true nature of self is though meditation, sitting down and observing what is happening in your mind.

    There is lots more to address from this angle - near death experiences, memories of past lives, clairvoyants, telepathy etc., but all neither of that contradicts the idea above.
     
    manjit and politicaljunkie like this.
  4. What experiments?

    But the self is the viewer/player of the game, the center point of the experience - or to be more technical, each self can be seen as the first-person recipient of intentionality & subjectivity?

    If you look at the post above yours, Arvan separates the bit-structures ability to represent extrinsic properties (relations) and the intrinsic subjectivity of 1st person awareness. (He also notes the one-further-fact argument for identity.)

    What about the days you keep the promise, or keep control over your irritability?

    How do you know that your meditation practice isn't confusing you and deluding you into thinking that there is no self?
     
    manjit and Steve like this.
  5. Small Dog

    Small Dog New

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2016
    Messages:
    226
    Experiments that demonstrate fragmented perception of reality. External and internal reality is perceived in the same way, as in built by the brain. Not noticing a gorilla in the dancing show and feeling the pain in the amputated limb is the result of the same processes.

    Meditation can definitely lead to delusion, no doubt. Here is another example that has been experienced at least sometimes by everyone. Which is disappearing during some task. It can be music, sport, work, sex - whatever. Or watching something that draws your full attention. Zen experience. Time stops and there is no self. This is the natural state of being. All you're able to perceive is the moment after moment. Which happens rarely, because of the unique ability of the human mind to suffer.

    As half joke, the controversy of consciousness penetrates our language and at the same time hints at its origins. We say, "I lost consciousness" Who is this "I" that lost consciousness? If "I" implies awareness, where was it when consciousness was not present?
     
    manjit likes this.
  6. If consciousness is an illusion, then shouldn't intelligent plants be given the same "rights" and protections as intelligent animals?


    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/02/160221-plant-science-botany-evolution-mabey-ngbooktalk/
     
  7. Afterlife research should be the primary field of consciousness research. Neuroscience and Psi ought to be considered subfields.
     
    tim and Roberta like this.
  8. Max_B

    Max_B Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2013
    Messages:
    3,155
    Home Page:
    It's a bit preachy to claim that being in 'flow' is the 'natural state of being'... I doubt we can say that.
     
    Roberta and Sciborg_S_Patel like this.
  9. Small Dog

    Small Dog New

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2016
    Messages:
    226
    Studying consciousness through afterlife research is similar to studying how boats work by observing the trace left by a boat on the water. Doesn't make much sense to me.
     
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2016
  10. Typoz

    Typoz Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2013
    Messages:
    2,407
    I don't understand the analogy. Maybe it makes sense only if one has a world-view where it makes sense. It seems very circular to me.
     
    Alex, Roberta and Sciborg_S_Patel like this.
  11. malf

    malf Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,045
    This only makes sense if one has a world-view where it makes sense. ;)

    The afterlife research interests me but is loaded with all sorts of problems.

    Remember, each bodily incarnation has 2 extremities. A much easier, and more fruitful, approach may be to study how consciousness emerges and matures at the other end of life, the beginning.
     
    Sciborg_S_Patel likes this.
  12. Typoz

    Typoz Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2013
    Messages:
    2,407
    Don't you mean how consciousness enters rather than emerges at the beginning?
     
  13. malf

    malf Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,045
    Well that would be an aspect to study. It certainly appears to emerge... or at least enter gradually,
     
  14. Ian Gordon

    Ian Gordon Ninshub Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2013
    Messages:
    1,676
    Not according to many NDErs and pre-birth memory experiencers (including Tim :)).
     
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2016
    tim and Roberta like this.
  15. malf

    malf Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,045
    Examining those memories could form part of such study (notwithstanding the reliability of recall and malleable nature of memories)
     
  16. Small Dog

    Small Dog New

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2016
    Messages:
    226
    I wouldn't put much significance on NDE research. All it shows that people whose heart stops have conscious experiences. EEG goes flat, but they still experience something. The problem with this is that we don't know when these experiences occur, when the blood supply to the brain was diminished, completely interrupted or when the circulation was restored. Moreover, EEG is a very crude and one-sided way to study the brain. It is comparable to EMG in the muscle: it reflects electrical events in the muscle, but doesn't tell us much about other aspects of muscle function - strength, speed of contraction etc.

    Coming back to NDE, it is completely plausible that reported experiences occur during "in" or "out" stages of the arrest.

    As far as the analogy of the waves behind the boat is concerned, it is - like anything else in the area of consciousness - the matter of belief. Everything leaves traces. You can study traces and make conclusions regarding the object that left them. Or you can study the object itself, and it seems to me that in this case you will get more reliable data. Afterlife communications - in my opinion - are exactly that, reading the traces left by the consciousness in the Universe.
     
  17. Here is why people who have realized non-duality don't believe in free will:

    When you look within, you realize you don't control anything. Thoughts, emotions, impulses arise without you being aware of how they are formed. Where do thoughts come from? Normal people accept them as "mine" but self-realized people don't. To them thoughts, impulses, emotions are things to be aware of like a car, or a tree. Maybe the brain has free will. But self-realized people see "themselves" as just the pure awareness not the things (thoughts, emotions, impulses) "they" are aware of. The world of things (cars, trees, houses, as well as emotions, impulses, and thoughts) is like a movie playing on the screen of pure awareness.

    That pure awareness is the only thing that is unchanging throughout life. Compared to the constancy of pure awareness, everything else is impermanent, ephemeral, unreal. Pure awareness is the only thing that is real, constant. It is our belief in the reality, solidity, permanence, of material things, as well as the belief in a self consisting of body, thoughts, emotions, and impulses, that confuses normal people and prevents them from seeing their true nature.
     
    Last edited: Feb 26, 2016
    Roberta and Steve like this.
  18. Typoz

    Typoz Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2013
    Messages:
    2,407
    Then is 'looking within' also uncontrolled? The ability to choose precedes the looking.
     
    Sciborg_S_Patel likes this.
  19. I also separate having emotions and impulses from my actual actions. Not going to pretend I'm the perfect person, but I can say there've been instances where my reasoning and will prevent me from letting my emotions/impulses take control.
     
    Jim_Smith likes this.
  20. Sciborg_S_Patel likes this.

Share This Page