Dr. Rupert Sheldrake Brings Science to Spiritual Practices |376|

Discussion in 'Skeptiko Shows' started by Alex, Mar 20, 2018.

  1. Baccarat

    Baccarat New

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2016
    Messages:
    785
    Because only the few hundred pages of the bible or qua ran can truly capture the infinite universe, religion is filtered, through perceptions
     
  2. gabriel

    gabriel New

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Messages:
    1,644
    FWIW malf, I don't attribute you with those characteristics. Annoying as you could sometimes be, you bought a rare humour to the party which was always welcome. Others treated scepticism as a rhetorical exercise, or a game of last man standing. Pissing in the well is not questioning the water quality.
     
    Laird, Silence and malf like this.
  3. Alex

    Alex New

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2013
    Messages:
    2,537
    the "evil in the world" thing seems like such a convoluted excuse for atheists.
     
    dpdownsouth likes this.
  4. Mishelle

    Mishelle Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2017
    Messages:
    162
    Home Page:
    I had heard rumors and viewed evidence of the forum's vital former self. To what do you owe this shadow, besides the one thing you mention? Surely there must be something besides 'Christianity bashing" that has driven the forum into the mud?
     
  5. Mishelle

    Mishelle Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2017
    Messages:
    162
    Home Page:
    I guess I'm still too novice for this question, b/c the notion of 'spiritual seekers' sounds similar to me as 'truthers' which sounds similar to me as scientism/religion, which then makes me balk at any measure of measuring! Is spirituality the search for meaning, or truth, or connection, or joy, or the all-pervasive divinity, or balance, or the end of suffering, or Oneness? Where science might interface and inform at this juncture, imo, is to craft some real definitions with universal meaning, expand the lexicon, perhaps? I know it's not just me who rolls her eyes with all the Bible talk, we who grew up skeptical in the Bible belt are perhaps too jaded, but do still have a place in this discussion, I dare say. Is what's 'best' what makes folks feel good? Is my idea of what's best for my neighbors really the best for them, and vice versa?

    And the thing is, I like this interview, I like Sheldrake, a lot! But I don't think holding up fictions for the sake of 'feels' is healthy for society, under most circumstances. We want to do it, are inclined to do it, b/c it makes us feel better in the moment, but not for the long-term.


    This sounds really beautiful and it struck me as a most essential part of the interview. I noticed the number of times he says "I".
     
    Jim_Smith likes this.
  6. gabriel

    gabriel New

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Messages:
    1,644
    You might ask the moderators, past and present. I wasn't around when the house fell in, fortunately.
     
  7. Raimo

    Raimo New

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2013
    Messages:
    163
    Oneness is the antithesis of spirituality.
     
    Mishelle likes this.
  8. Obiwan

    Obiwan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2013
    Messages:
    1,226
    I think for me it’s when chunks of it started to going missing, seemingly arbitrarily. There didn’t seem much point posting things that might either be moved around or disappear like the staircases at Hoggwarts.

    I can’t say I ever suffered any of the undue moderation others report however that’s probably because I never said anything interesting or controversial :). It certainly seems to have put off some of the more interesting posters, but not all of them.

    Then a lot of the more prolific and interesting posters decided they’d had enough and vacated. I keep an eye in here but rarely see much of interest to me these days.

    I can’t say I’ve seen widespread Christianity bashing here (perhaps one or two posters seem to have a real beef), at least not on threads I’ve read, but I suppose it’s in the eye of the beholder. If religious sources are cited as an authority here I find it a turn-off but unless it’s posted on a topic I’m interested in I don’t see it. I can’t say it’s a site that’s pro-organised religion but other than individual posters perhaps, it’s never struck me as particularly anti-religious either.
     
  9. gabriel

    gabriel New

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Messages:
    1,644
    I can't recall a single repent-you're-all-going-to-hell type post ever on Skeptiko. When Christianity is mentioned it's mostly a byword for ignorance and/or hypocrisy. TBH I think much of it is a Pavlovian reaction given the lack of original content, and I'm happy to let any latent OCD tendencies loose on its perpetrators.

    There have been some well informed commentators on the bible who did a job on Atwill, but they only show up when the forum becomes extra stupid. Most of the time Christianity is mentioned when people are bored and want to stir things up. I'd hate to see mentions of religion banned, but it's hard to recall many intelligent discussions on the topic. Sheldrake's could have been, and Bernardo discussed religion a while ago, but they're mostly tribal bonding exercises for ex-materialists.
     
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2018
    Jim_Smith and Obiwan like this.
  10. Obiwan

    Obiwan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2013
    Messages:
    1,226
    Me neither.

    I don’t recall seeing this but I could be because it’s been on threads that don’t attract me, or selective memory.
     
  11. gabriel

    gabriel New

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Messages:
    1,644
    You wouldn't have to dig far if you were interested.
     
  12. Obiwan

    Obiwan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2013
    Messages:
    1,226
    Right.
     
  13. Wormwood

    Wormwood Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2017
    Messages:
    310
    Sorry guys I was in a pissy mood when I wrote my last post. It wasn’t really necessary and I sort of strawmanned you guys.
     
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2018
  14. Turning off stress:

    http://ncu9nc.blogspot.com/2018/04/the-parasympathetic-nervous-system-and.html
    Turning Off Stress: The Parasympathetic Nervous System And Spiritual Development
    ...
    The sympathetic nervous system is involved in producing the body's response to stress. The parasympathetic nervous system is involved in turning off the body's response to stress.

    Anything that activates the parasympathetic nervous system suppresses the sympathetic nervous system and helps you to relax.
    ...
    Learning to turn off stress is also helpful in spiritual development because when you are stressed, you are more likely to be thinking about yourself and your problems ie. being egocentric. But when you are relaxed, you are less likely to be thinking about yourself and more likely to be in harmony with spiritual values like love, kindness, forgiveness, tolerance etc.​
     
  15. David Bailey

    David Bailey Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2013
    Messages:
    4,155
    Gabriel,

    People on this forum have different opinions, and often express them fairly forcibly, but do you really want to come to a forum where everyone is censored to maintain a strict line?

    Clearly our core subjects overlap with the concerns of religion, so the subject is bound to come up, and since it obviously hurts you to read opinions that are critical of religion, why not skip over those posts? Alternatively, feel free to participate in the discussion (as you have), but try not to be miffed if others disagree.

    You say, " I'd hate to see mentions of religion banned" - well good, because I have zero intention to impose such a ban! I think the relationship between religion and psychic evidence is fascinating. I mean clearly the ideas of Christianity and NDE reports overlap extensively. However, I guess even you are not really a conventional Christian - if such exists - so why not start a thread dedicated to your view of things and how you see Christianity relating to the other religions, and to ψ in general?

    David
     
    Laird likes this.
  16. David Bailey

    David Bailey Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2013
    Messages:
    4,155
    While I agree with that in one way, I feel the way you express this sounds remarkably materialist - which I am pretty sure you aren't!

    For example, one reads that one of the amigdala processes fear. Compartmentalising the brain's function in that way can make one think of a machine where different bits have different functions. However, consider how a fear centre might really work - what does it actually do?

    Well if I saw a tiger racing towards me, I'd be very fearful.

    However if I was in a zoo, and there was a suitable fence, I'd just marvel at the power of the beast.

    However, if I knew that there was a dispute about whether the fencing was adequate, I might feel fear once more.

    If I wasn't in a zoo, and had a gun, and knew how to use it, I might feel sorrow because I would be safe but have to kill the creature.

    What I am getting at, is that the fear centre would have to call on the whole of the rest of the mind in order to even determine if fear was an appropriate response!

    This observation seems to generalise - specifying that any portion of the mind/brain - a hormone, a 'component' of the brain, or the parasympathetic nervous system performs some role, inevitably pulls in the rest of the mind!

    David
     
  17. I agree there is a huge problem on skeptiko because it is very hostile to Christians. There are many forms of Christianity and many different ways it is practiced. Some of them are hugely beneficial to individuals, and historically Christianity has played a hugely beneficial role in the development of our civilization. But you would never know that from reading skeptiko, because the vast majority of posts that mention Christianity are one sided and biased against Christianity. They give readers a misimpression of Christianity because they never mention its good qualities only the problems. But every human endeavor has imperfections because humans are imperfect. However when Christianity is mentioned on skeptiko, you only hear about the imperfections and you never hear about how those compare to other human endeavors.

    And this is just a part of a bigger bias against religion where all of the many diverse and various religions, most of which the writers are ignorant of, are lumped together and condemned because of their bias against Christianity.

    The problem is not just misinforming readers, it drives away members so we have fewer viewpoints and learn less. I have pointed out before that the forum is unfriendly to atheists and Christians. Who is left to participate?


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_United_States#Statistics

    Religion in the United States
    ...
    Christian 73.7
    Protestant/Other Christian 48.9
    Catholic 23.0
    Mormon 1.8
    None/Atheist/Agnostic 18.2
    Non-Christian faiths 5.4
    Jewish 2.1
    Muslim 0.8
    Other non-Christian religion 2.5
    No response given 2.6
    Total 100
     
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2018
  18. gabriel

    gabriel New

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Messages:
    1,644
    I'm happy to challenge anti-Christian rhetoric without the threat of banning. Censorship isn't my bag.
    I can see that may be the case in particular instances. I fail to see how psi as a subject invites comparisons with organised religion. Unless you believe a single example of precognition or spoon bending is to court the Inquisition and the collapse of civilisation. In which case I disagree. Materialism has an endless supply of promise notes.
    It doesn't hurt me in the least. I only correct the most egregious errors and systemic prejudice. An individual's take on religion is none of my business. They may have personally suffered at the hands of the religious, they may find the idea of God an intolerable imposition on their world view. They may enjoy a healthy social life based on the mutual support of fellow sceptics. None of these things are my concern.
    Does that mean don't challenge them? Or do challenge them but expect a ban for upsetting people? If it's the latter I strongly disagree that I've upset anyone, and I've discussed everything from crop circles, to ghosts, to philosophy on this forum. Can you show an example of miffed-ness on my part?
    Not sure how you work that out? I'm a mainstream Catholic, neither archly traditional nor liberal progressive. If you can show where I've transgressed orthodoxy by my views I'm happy to listen. Rupert Sheldrake is way more theologically liberal than me, but that doesn't change my respect for him. He's remarkably sanguine in the face of intolerance generally and I'm sure we'd get on just fine. Indeed we have communicated on affable terms.
    That would make the forum "all about me" and that's something anyone should avoid in public discussion. I've contributed to all kinds of subjects, and reject the label of apologist. Why don't you start a thread about why you're so intolerant of Christianity? This one is about Sheldrake's take on Christianity in the context of other religions and his scientific background. It's clear you think his beliefs are completely antipathetic to his research, perhaps you'd like to explore why you think that in terms that aren't just hand-waving?
     
  19. David Bailey

    David Bailey Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2013
    Messages:
    4,155
    Sharing your views in one thread would hardly involve you taking over the whole forum :)

    I would say that any evidence that materialism is wrong/incomplete is relevant to religions of all sorts.

    Anyway, the way International politics is headed, we may all get our DE's and learn a lot more about reality very soon :(

    David
     
  20. gabriel

    gabriel New

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Messages:
    1,644
    Why do you say that? I've always believed the opposition between reductionism and religion is a false dichotomy invented by materialists as a scare story. Lets be clear, religion is not an appeal to logic, it requires belief, aka faith. Materialism holds belief as toxic to the progress of mankind, religion sees faith as desirable, even necessary.

    It's hard to see how an example of psi indicates God, much less organised religion. Bernardo thinks mind-at-large is responsible, Radin believes in a cloud of consciousness. Neither of these resemble a Christian deity, and both would be at pains to distance themselves from the concept. I've described this forum as post-materialist, and that may be responsible for our differences. You, like Richard Dawkins, really do think psi is a short circuit to God. I'm satisfied the phenomena we describe as psi are real, and require no further evidence of the fact, but they don't inform my beliefs. Psi isn't my religion substitute and if it's yours I can see why my opinions would be a problem for you.
     

Share This Page