So the questions were:
- What do you make of Kevin's message(which is twofold)?
- Fold 1: allusions to something bigger happening, possibly some UFO-related spectacle seen by a much wider audience.
- Fold 2: when whatever spectacle happens it will change people who witness it in some fundamental way
- Is Kevin relaying a good warning or controlled messaging?
My initial response to the first question is fairly simple: Kevin's message isn't anything new. I believe some of the other posts in response to this show make that point too. The modern UFO phenomena is replete with individuals who witness a UFO event and subsequently make statements or even prophesy about some great change that is either
about to happen or
is happening. Some of these individuals gain followers and develop into full blown cult leaders like Billy Meire, George Adamski, or Claude Vorilhon(by mentioning these people I do not mean to cast aspersions onto Kevin who seems sincere to me). So the question is: IS something bigger happening? Well, maybe? Perhaps the important thing is what is the
effect on the outlook of people when they are told by someone like Kevin that something bigger is or will be happening? Could it help provide the framework or filter for interpreting or even
reinterpreting some event or events? Is it psychological priming?
Kevin's whole view of reality probably changed and that is a profound, disturbing, and difficult experience that would take anyone some time to process. I might've quit my job and spent some time away too 'cause WTF just happened?! It's also worth keeping in mind that while in this psychological state we are highly susceptible to being influenced without necessarily being aware of it. Jacques Vallee wrote about a great example of it where a psychologist was walking around a street corner and a man bumped into him. The man apologized for not looking where he was going and the psychologist responded by looking at his wristwatch and informing the man that it was 4:30pm when it was actually 2:30pm. I may have the times he gave wrong but the basic idea is that when as people we find ourselves confronted by something that just doesn't make sense or is contradictory to our expectations/beliefs we immediately start looking for information that will help us regain some kind of cognitive equilibrium.
Regarding the second question: I don't know but my intuition says to be wary. Incidentally I feel the same way about Jeremy Corbell but for mostly different reasons: just too much enthusiasm, not enough reasonable skepticism and he doesn't appear to be a good listener(just check out his debate with Stanton Friedman about Bob Lazar). We know for a fact that we have been misled and deceived time and time again by people who knew they were misleading and lying to us. Could they have a good reason for doing so? Yup, but they've certainly dug themselves a difficult hole to get out of and if I were in their shoes I might consider handing the shovel to someone like Kevin and taking him on the road too.
Alternatively, could they have a bad reason for lying to us? Yup. This phenomena represents a potentially world altering power on many, many levels and we all have an inner Sauron who does not share power(cue pic of Yoda with Gandalf quote misattributed to Voldemort).
My two cents.