Arouet
Member
Thanks for some of the positive comments guys! Most days I can roll with negativity but if I'm having a down day they can push me into quite dark spirits. Feeling better today.
Greyson did a literature review from 1977-2013: Almost 40 Years Investigating Near-Death Experiences: An Overview of Mainstream Scientific Journals (not sure if its behind a paywall, if anyone can't access the full text PM me).
Here's the breakdown based on 277 papers.
Note, however that this study did not include articles from the Journal of Near-Death Studies, which has over 700 articles. I don't know the breakdown there.
Are there hundreds?
I've read a few but most are quite guarded in their conclusions. I've suggested in the past giving skeptics 3 or 4 papers to look at before your interview as it would provide a more informed discussion and the interviewee would have a better idea where you're coming from. Which papers best support your position?
Greyson did a literature review from 1977-2013: Almost 40 Years Investigating Near-Death Experiences: An Overview of Mainstream Scientific Journals (not sure if its behind a paywall, if anyone can't access the full text PM me).
Here's the breakdown based on 277 papers.
Note, however that this study did not include articles from the Journal of Near-Death Studies, which has over 700 articles. I don't know the breakdown there.