Martial Law Coming Soon?

Another side to the question is what if the military got tired of the controlled government and wanted to overthrow it to replace it with something independent? The corrupt government might declare martial law and then find the military taking over from them.

I am deeply suspicious that all senators, representatives, judges, and basically anyone can be subverted by data collected by the NSA. For example anyone who views pornography would be an easy target. Suppose the NSA has records of all porn anyone viewed on the internet. All they have to do is have a private meeting and say, "You saw this porn and this model is underage. You are now our tool unless you want to be brought up on child porn charges." It doesn't matter how old the model really was, the threat of legal action would be enough to obtain compliance. Because the charges would be brought by law enforcement not the NSA itself, no one would believe the charges were trumped up for blackmail. But it doesn't have to be porn, there are so many laws that most people are criminals even if they don't know it. Or, they can be setup easily if the need arises:

http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2013/06/no-one-is-innocent.html
No One is Innocent

by Alex Tabarrok on June 21, 2013 at 7:22 am in History, Law, Political Science | Permalink

I broke the law yesterday and again today and I will probably break the law tomorrow. Don’t mistake me, I have done nothing wrong. I don’t even know what laws I have broken. Nevertheless, I am reasonably confident that I have broken some laws, rules, or regulations recently because its hard for anyone to live today without breaking the law. Doubt me? Have you ever thrown out some junk mail that came to your house but was addressed to someone else? That’s a violation of federal law punishable by up to 5 years in prison.



I suspect the e-mails of General Patraeus's affair were obtained illegally, it is very possibly he one victim, and blackmail would explain why John Boehner seems to act more like a Democrat than a Republican. Chief Justice Robert's flip-flop on the health care law ruling is also suspicious.

If the average person heard there was a military coup that declared martial law to overthrow the controlled government and replace it with something uncontrolled, ... the average person wouldn't know which side to be on. The victims of NSA blackmail senators, judges, maybe the president himself, might even be supportive.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/1597/confidence-institutions.aspx
June 2014:

Trust a great deal or quite a lot:

Military: 39%, 35%
Presidency: 14, 15
Congress 4,3%
 
Last edited:
But it doesn't have to be porn, there are so many laws that most people are criminals even if they don't know it.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/03/29/crime-law-criminal-unfair-column/70630978/

If you walk down the sidewalk, pick up a pretty feather, and take it home, you could be a felon — if it happens to be a bald eagle feather. Bald eagles are plentiful now, and were taken off the endangered species list years ago, but the federal law making possession of them a crime for most people is still on the books, and federal agents are even infiltrating some Native-American powwows in order to find and arrest people. (And feathers from lesser-known birds, like the red-tailed hawk are also covered). Other examples abound, from getting lost in a storm and snowmobiling on the wrong bit of federal land, to diverting storm sewer water around a building.
...
But other times, the prosecutors are out to get you for your politics, your ethnicity, or just in order to fulfill a quota, in which case you will hear that the law is the law, and that ignorance is no excuse. (Amusingly, government officials who break the law do get to plead ignorance and good intentions, under the doctrine of good faith "qualified immunity." Just not us proles.)
 
="Hurmanetar, post: 62711, member: 1078"]I agree that it all starts with the individual and the individual's worldview. That is why these topics of consciousness and materialism interest me so much. Everything flows from there. Someone said it is easier to change the course of a river up in the mountain headwaters rather than down near its mouth.

Exactly.Many people claim to want to change the world ,while in fact they are just projecting their own unresolved psychological issues, impotence and failures on the world : real change comes from within thus and is contagious too lol, or as Ghandi used to say , or in similar words to the same effect at least : Be the change you wish to see in this world.

I hear you on patriotic narcissism. I think true patriotism is simply looking out for the interests of your neighbor and that selflessness could extend to larger political boundaries such as the nation-state. But unfortunately this good patriotism gets twisted into a means for people to expand their pride by identifying their ego with the greatness of the nation-state (much like they also do with sports teams). This pride keeps them from being able to honestly evaluate the corruption within the nation-state because an attack on the character of the nation-state becomes personal.

Sure : all forms of fake pride do originate from the ego and get projected on the "outside " world , that's why all forms of fake pride , either the religious , secular or national ones are synonymous of exclusion, intolerance , bigotry , dogmatism, violence , discrimination, hate ...in relation to those who happen to be unlucky enough to be outside of the group.

Real or true national or other "pride" is that of doing good for your community , country or fellow humans neighbors, family , loved ones ... out of unconditional love without expecting anything in return and without excluding anyone outside of the group through any negative egocentric feelings , suppressed or not.



Do you think the democratizing and enlightening power of the internet can overcome the increasing narcissism and selfishness that other aspects of the internet provide? Do you think humanity as a whole is truly progressing - albeit in an oscillating fashion - ever closer towards some ideal state or is progress just an illusion?

Internet is a good thing , despite its negative and flawed part, and it has been enabling people to communicate with each other globally in unprecedented ways, needless to add , and it has been also a magnificent and an effective tool to raise consciousness :The internet revolution has been accelerating human 'evolution" at the level of consciousness at least , in different ways , some in the wrong directions too in accordance with some people's own tendencies, agendas , and inner states thus , but there is a growing or an increasing number of people who are genuinely interested in global consciousness/awareness /raising and spiritual growth though , some naive and credulous , some more discerning , some were /are infiltrated by secret services , ....so , this phenomenon has many faces , shapes and forms.

It all depends thus on the inner states, intelligence , wisdom, experience , education, motives ...of the people involved , so logically you have naive credulous lunatics , new agers , ...and some enlightened folks too , exactly like in the case of political parties , religious sects , or in the case of "independent " people ...

I am very optimistic about all that , but the power that be , corporate power , to be more precise , is well aware of all that and will have to put up a hell of a fight to at least manage all that and redirect it to its own advantage .

I like Peter Russell's "Global mind " by the way.This physicist sees humanity on this planet as a whole community or global mind that will be evolving through the internet revolution as some sort of extension of the human nervous system via the flow of information, ideas , insights , experiences ...of the individual minds ( 2 or more minds are better than 1 ) who are interconnecting with each other (The whole universe is interconnected , so) :

Human consciousness /awareness has been experiencing thus an unprecedented growth or 'evolution" , in many ways , but let's not forget about the fact that the devil is in the details and that corporate power is not sleeping in that regard :

Russell has an attractive idealistic view of all that , while discarding the human nature on the subject, the one that remains confined within the small limits of ego , in fact :


Cheers.
 
I am deeply suspicious that all senators, representatives, judges, and basically anyone can be subverted by data collected by the NSA.

November 12, 2014
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2014/11/1...ely-if-white-house-forges-bad-deal-with-iran/
Menendez, Kirk Vow to ‘Act Decisively’ If White House Forges Bad Deal with Iran
The Democratic chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and his GOP co-sponsor of legislation to keep the heat on Iran vowed to “act decisively” against any administration deal that doesn’t kill the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program.


Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), whose legislation includes strict guidance for the compliance necessary to ease sanctions, said in a joint statement today “a good deal will dismantle, not just stall, Iran’s illicit nuclear program and prevent Iran from ever becoming a threshold nuclear weapons state.”
April 1, 2015
http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/01/politics/robert-menendez-corruption-charges/
Washington (CNN)—A defiant Sen. Robert Menendez asserted his innocence and pledged to fight federal corruption charges brought against him Wednesday, which he said were politically motivated and "intended to silence me."

If anyone thinks there might be merit to the charges, consider the fact that there are much worse abuses by other officials that the justice department is ignoring ... so why was Menendez charged and not them?
 
Last edited:
I watched this the other day and thought it was interesting, but not worth sharing because who knows how audio/video can be manipulated...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=69&v=GEo0qX-ScfQ

But saw another article on it today where the Ad Council responded to concerns saying that the background news report about martial law was: "...a pre-existing, fictional vintage audio file as ambient background noise to invoke an earlier era; it was not intended to provide any additional messaging or for any additional purpose." So they did not deny that this was the original background audio. http://www.infowars.com/ad-council-responds-to-bizarre-psa-featuring-martial-law-announcement/

Then some of the commenters pointed out that there is a lot of Jade in this video (sweaters, towels, knitting needles) and in one shot, there is jade right next to a "helm" of a ship:
6dtFKkS.jpg


In my opinion this is too much to chalk up to coincidence.

Here is the original Ad:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=22&v=jT6imIqaCQs

Background audio news report:
“…are also encouraged to lock and bar all doors, windows, and any other points of entry. Riots nationwide have prompted local governments to declare Martial Law. The President is asking that citizens find safety and remain calm.
Authorities are working their hardest to contain the outbreak.”
 
Perhaps one reason this exercise has sparked more outrage than others is that Texas (where I live) and Utah are labeled as hostile territory.

Really? Why are Texas and Utah considered hostile territories? I grew up in Utah and currently live in Texas. I can see that sort of being true due to the independent spirit of both cultures, but why not Idaho? It's Utah 2.0, but with a smaller population. And Oklahoma? It's Texas 2.0 with a smaller population. Montana? Northern California?
 
Really? Why are Texas and Utah considered hostile territories? I grew up in Utah and currently live in Texas. I can see that sort of being true due to the independent spirit of both cultures, but why not Idaho? It's Utah 2.0, but with a smaller population. And Oklahoma? It's Texas 2.0 with a smaller population. Montana? Northern California?

I'm not really familiar with Utah politics, but as far as Texas goes, it has a large population with oil and gas production rivaling that of Saudi Arabia, sea ports, industry, farm and ranch land, a few large population centers, and a gun-loving culture of freedom and independence. Texas could theoretically succeed at seceding and/or leading a new constitutional convention. The other regions you mentioned are some havens for preppers and independent folks, but those regions have less political and economic power.
 
I'm not really familiar with Utah politics, but as far as Texas goes, it has a large population with oil and gas production rivaling that of Saudi Arabia, sea ports, industry, farm and ranch land, a few large population centers, and a gun-loving culture of freedom and independence. Texas could theoretically succeed at seceding and/or leading a new constitutional convention. The other regions you mentioned are some havens for preppers and independent folks, but those regions have less political and economic power.
Yeah, I guess I should have said I understand why Texas could be seen as "hostile" to big gov. But Utah? I'm perplexed.

Hmmm...the LDS church would be considered a Fortune 500 company if it wasn't non-profit. And they know how to truly take care of their own. In their defense, they really do have one of the best charity models in the world. Plus their strong sense of community and family loyalty. Ok, maybe I just answered my own question.

Utah's main problem is it's land locked. The gulf coast is one of Texas' big wins.

I still chuckle at this, because I think it's really a non-issue, but one if the reasons my husband was keen on moving here was due to the fact that if a revolution/civil war broke out Texas would function pretty well on its own. It would be literal hell though for any one sitting on the left side of the political aisle.
 
Yeah, I guess I should have said I understand why Texas could be seen as "hostile" to big gov. But Utah? I'm perplexed.

Hmmm...the LDS church would be considered a Fortune 500 company if it wasn't non-profit. And they know how to truly take care of their own. In their defense, they really do have one of the best charity models in the world. Plus their strong sense of community and family loyalty. Ok, maybe I just answered my own question.

Utah's main problem is it's land locked. The gulf coast is one of Texas' big wins.

I still chuckle at this, because I think it's really a non-issue, but one if the reasons my husband was keen on moving here was due to the fact that if a revolution/civil war broke out Texas would function pretty well on its own. It would be literal hell though for any one sitting on the left side of the political aisle.

Yee-haw! :) Welcome to Texas!
 
Yeah, I guess I should have said I understand why Texas could be seen as "hostile" to big gov. But Utah? I'm perplexed.

Hmmm...the LDS church would be considered a Fortune 500 company if it wasn't non-profit. And they know how to truly take care of their own. In their defense, they really do have one of the best charity models in the world. Plus their strong sense of community and family loyalty. Ok, maybe I just answered my own question.

Utah's main problem is it's land locked. The gulf coast is one of Texas' big wins.

I still chuckle at this, because I think it's really a non-issue, but one if the reasons my husband was keen on moving here was due to the fact that if a revolution/civil war broke out Texas would function pretty well on its own. It would be literal hell though for any one sitting on the left side of the political aisle.

By the way, I like the way your husband thinks... sounds like a smart guy!
 
Isn't the fact that no one - not even our elected representatives in congress - can share with us details about the TPP without threat of arrest, proof positive that we are already living under martial law?
 
The struggle against materialism which destroys the meaning of life is closely related to the struggle for individual freedom.
I presume you mean that it's materialism that destroys the meaning of life, not the struggle. I disagree with your premise. How does immaterialism come up with some kind of intrinsic meaning?

~~ Paul
 
I presume you mean that it's materialism that destroys the meaning of life, not the struggle.

Yes... I worded that poorly and ambiguously.

I disagree with your premise. How does immaterialism come up with some kind of intrinsic meaning?

This is a good question. Could I start to answer this by asking if you consider your life to be meaningful, and if so, where does that meaning come from?
 
I agree that human creativity will ultimately find a way to break these brittle defenses just as the inquisitions of the dark ages eventually gave way to the more free open and egalitarian era of the enlightenment.. I don't think any tyranny - even one supported by high technology - can endure forever. But what I would like to avoid is a new prolonged dark age where the chilling effect of an oppressive government stifles creativity and scientific and intellectual progress. Yes I am optimistic that this can be avoided, but the specifics of how it will all go down is still a big unknown and something I have an interest in contemplating. I don't think pure faith in human creativity will cause they tyranny to diminish... after all, "faith without works is dead."

Someone I really admire in this area is John McAfee. This guy is really intelligent and fiercely independent. He has managed to avoid plenty of snares laid for him and is aggressively pushing back against the encroaching technological tyranny. He has lately been exposing these fake cell phone towers of which there are thousands around the country.
Fake cell phone towers?
 
My life is meaningful. The meaning comes from within and from my interaction with others and with the world.

~~ Paul

So you and those you interact with create your meaning. I'm in agreement with that. Am I then correct in saying you believe there was no meaning to your life before you were born, and after you die and all memory of you has faded, there will no longer be any meaning to your life? Furthermore, would I be correct that you believe your life means nothing to the universe because the universe has no memory and no capacity to care? Would I be correct to say that the relative length of your finite life approaches zero when compared to the vast or possibly infinite age of the universe?

I think that only a conscious being can create meaning by remembering the past, anticipating the future, and making choices in the present. Another way to put it is that meaning arises when a conscious being observes or participates in a story including his or her own story.

For a materialist this story is short and has relatively few interwoven connections. It is a story isolated within randomness. For an idealist, this story is not short and isolated but contiguous with the whole story of the universe. The universe remembers you. You contribute something to the universal story. And the universe cares and remembers whatever it chooses to remember. Your meaningful story is encapsulated in a vast sea of randomness which is encapsulated in the mind. The randomness is not the absolute ground state of being, but it is the blank canvas the mind creates to paint upon and exercise choice within.

The materialist can create his or her own meaning. But I think that the materialist beliefs limit that capacity. Mentally stronger more well integrated materialists like yourself can get along just fine with the amount of meaning they create for themselves. Others who are not so strong or well integrated or who are suffering greatly or facing death, find it very difficult to create their own meaning while maintaining materialist beliefs. Suffering and death can create a deep hunger for meaning that can often only be satisfied if one believes in a greater timeless connection to the whole and that the memory and effects of one's life will not altogether fade away to nothing.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top