I think this is well worded. I also think - and stand open to clarification and correction from Max - that further measurements continue to add enough Shannon information to make the data well-formed regarding an evolving quantum event sequence. In particular, I imagine that quantum Zeno effect as another way to see the bits add-up to have enough mutual information to track isolated particles like they are "macro billiard balls".
Of course, when isolated and measured one at a time - they only have enough Shannon information to show "one foot" in reality.
It is complicated, I only have a conceptual understanding and am not properly able to explain. But the uncertainty principle comes about between the relationship between observables and their commuters. Basicaly the observables commute or they don't. If they do commute their are no restrictions on accuracy. If they don't the general uncertainty principle holds.
So if there are commuters, it would imply time ordering important in the uncertainty relationship otherwise commuters must be zero.
Eg. Take five steps, turn left, take two steps turn right take ten steps and jump.
Or turn right take five steps, jump, take ten steps turn left and take two steps.
This is very simplistic, it is an interesting point you raise but not at all simple.
Any measurement will find the system in a definate state, where as the wave function is a super position of states. So the future is then defined by the initial state from when the measurement is made. So the measurement does something to the system.
which is not a consequence of the Schrodinger equation. So you see the issue. The Xeno effect shows it, generally measuring halts the evolution of the quantum sequence.
Electrons, the wave function, are not real in the same sense of things we have of the macro. Time is not an issue for the unreal.