Max. No you are confused about what I am talking about. I even mentioned I knew the distinction you were making and said you were not wrong. What is up with comprehension here?
I was mainly adressing this point...
"Is exactly what the OP is addressing wasn't It?"
I said in only part, because it relates to the delayed choice experiment. That the properties are not independant. Different to what you said that the measurements are independant. Yes I know. As I said. I can say it again if you like?
What exactly am I confused about Max?
It seems you are confused. Choice is the factor, it is a delayed choice experiment! the choice of what and how to measure can... if you believe the particle took a particular path, (realism) then choices of measurement are effecting the past! I don't know what you are on about really. It does affect your point directly. My post was very simple, sorry If I hurt your ego, I did not think it was a big deal.
Seriously I wonder why I post sometimes. Why ask a question if you don't want it answered?
BTW I can't speak for Stephen but I got no such thing from his post. The term sequential measurement should be enough to distinguish. An assumption on your part perhaps? I could be wrong. That is up to Stephen.
Actually it is dependant on how much information you extract. As you mention, weak measurement. Once again, about knowing. So no it is not independant, it depends on much of one you measure.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/particle-measurement-sidesteps-the-uncertainty-principle/