bishop
Member
This is general question meant for anyone who has a good knowledge of presentiment experiments. I'm posting here because this section seems to get the most traction.
Does anyone know if, as part of any presentiment experiments, a researcher was provided with the raw physical response data without knowing what the correlated pictures were and was able to then correctly identify the basic nature of those correlated pictures using only that data?
Sorry if my question is awkwardly worded. To give a specific example, say three types of pictures are shown to test subjects: scary, erotic, and bucolic. And the results show that before each type of picture, specific physical response correlates to the types of pictures. In my layman's understanding of the research, this is the real meat of the results that prove that people can anticipate/predict something specific and above chance. So is it then possible for someone familiar with how these things correlate to look only at the physical response data and say "this data shows they were about to see something bucolic", etc?
Is anything like that part of the research? If so can someone point me to it. And if not, any ideas why?
Thanks.
Does anyone know if, as part of any presentiment experiments, a researcher was provided with the raw physical response data without knowing what the correlated pictures were and was able to then correctly identify the basic nature of those correlated pictures using only that data?
Sorry if my question is awkwardly worded. To give a specific example, say three types of pictures are shown to test subjects: scary, erotic, and bucolic. And the results show that before each type of picture, specific physical response correlates to the types of pictures. In my layman's understanding of the research, this is the real meat of the results that prove that people can anticipate/predict something specific and above chance. So is it then possible for someone familiar with how these things correlate to look only at the physical response data and say "this data shows they were about to see something bucolic", etc?
Is anything like that part of the research? If so can someone point me to it. And if not, any ideas why?
Thanks.