I always wonder, why there is no one else thinking in the same way as me.
The reason why I (as a true skeptic) do not put weights on paranormal phenomenon accounts, is not they are univocal or not reproducible, rather, is whether they present "content full of details", that is also to say, whether they provide abundant information.
Univocal or irreproducible are not the problem, the problem is that paranormal phenomenon accounts provide no sufficient information, no "content full of details", no new insight, whereas academic science always provides new theory, new discoveries, new insight, new information.
Sure, we can't 100% prove paranormal believes are all incorrect, as well as we can't 100% prove science is always correct.
But the "100% prove" is not the most important for us to concern right now. The most important thing is that we need information to further investigate.
Paranormal explanations always camouflage or disguise as if they know a lot of knowledges from the vast higher dimension, but they actually tell us almost nothing! On the other side, science is super abundant and complex and it is evolving everyday!
If there is a God, or there is existence in higher dimension, when they wish to tell us something, they tell us straightly and directly, they don't need to be shy or play game of "you guess".
They do not tell us many things. So it is easy to deduce either they do not exist at all, or they are not interested in communicating with us.
The things are not that simple. Reality is always super complex. Science tells me something very very complex, so I believe science.
Religions, paranormal explanations, superstitious traditions, they tell me very very little, so I do not believe them.
Someone would tell me, no! they do not tell us very very little, there are plethora of evidences of paranormal here and there, everywhere.
Ha ha, hi, man, check them again and you will find those are all disguise! They never tell us many things, especially when compared with the science (which is already sufficiently complex), but they always pretend as if they are profound or mysterious.
I do not believe them, this is the stance of a true skeptic, and I have presented my reasons, in short, the "information" of the truth.