After more than three decades of research into the potential of human consciousness, Dean Radin
Couldn't that just be that Dean sees humans as much easier to deal with? You can ask a human subject to think about some specific other person when an indicator comes on, but you can't do the same with an animal - at least not so easily.This is where Radin goes off-the-rails. He continues to put the physical and especially humans as the primary focus. So he ends up with the idea that consciousness = "human consciousness' when it is more closely a case of "consciousness's humans."
Were it just that one thing maybe. But given much of what is expressed by Radin - that leaning seems clear. And that's okay. That perspective - though inaccurate - doesn't mean that much of his work isn't valid.Couldn't that just be that Dean sees humans as much easier to deal with? You can ask a human subject to think about some specific other person when an indicator comes on, but you can't do the same with an animal - at least not so easily.
David