I'm disagreeing with Steve that ID papers are fraught with postulations about a Christian God, not that Christianity pushes a Christian scientist's agenda to support. I just don't see any scientifically oriented ID papers concluding that the Christian God is real; they just suggest something more non random than blind evolution.You seem to be disagreeing with Steve but Steve's argument is that we should take into account the motives behind ID authors - which is in line with what you seem to advocate in taking into account the subconscious motives.
I am disagreeing with both you and Steve in that we should ignore subconscious or even concious motives and just focus on the arguments being advanced.
I have no doubt their faith motivates them.