Next challenge please.
When I saw your reply:We were all attempting to stimulate legitimate psi by channeling the inner Trickster.
Edit: And I want to know how close I was on number of tabs open on your browser...?
, I looked at the number of tabs open (I use Chrome), I believe there were about five (sometimes the number is larger though, but almost always smaller than 20). 76 tabs open simultaneously, that's really an enormous and unrealistic number (for me at least). With the browser Google Chrome, when the number of tabs becomes equal to at least 18, it becomes more complicated to close an inactive tab because the little cross disappears, and you have to right click on it.It's 1. I know this because Bro and Malf are both terrible at remote viewing. Also, you have 76 tabs open on your browser. That is way too many.
When I saw your reply:
, I looked at the number of tabs open (I use Chrome), I believe there were about five (sometimes the number is larger though, but almost always smaller than 20). 76 tabs open simultaneously, that's really an enormous and unrealistic number (for me at least). With the browser Google Chrome, when the number of tabs becomes equal to at least 18, it becomes more complicated to close an inactive tab because the little cross disappears, and you have to right click on it.
I had a friend who kept an enormous number of tabs open (occasionally upwards of 100) because he would intend to read them later and never got around to it. He recently lost his voice due to spasmodic dysphonia and now sounds a lot like batman.
Interesting. I responded early in the thread:
"2. Confident."
But I deleted my response once it looked like the thread was going off the tracks.
along these lines is this 5 minute video -
Another great demonstration by Diane Powell on how not to design an experiment...
Another great demonstration by Diane Powell on how not to design an experiment...
Leaving aside protocol considerations, Diane totally flubbed the probability calculation at the end of the demonstration when she said:
Well, one way to look at it is, he got three out of the five correct. To get three of them correct, it would be one out of nine, times one out of nine, times one out of nine, which is one out of 729.
Undoubtedly, she was thinking of getting three hits in only three trials, for which 1/729 (0.0014) is correct. But the kid got three hits in five trials, for a probability of 1/86.7 (0.0115). It's a shame that someone of her academic and intellectual stature wasn't aware of the many online binomial probability calculators (here's one of them) used for situations like this. Someone with a basic understanding of probability theory should have coached her in their use, prior to her visit with the kid.