The species paradox

#1
Hi Here is another work of Magister colin leslie dean

The species paradox

THE REFUTATION EVOLUTIONARY THEORY: NATURAL SELECTION SHOWN TO BE WRONG

in order to resolve the dean paradox
the dean paradox makes you abandon the word species
in which case biology is destroyed
and all this talk in biology about speciation species this species that is meaningless nonsense

Species are those animals that can only mate with themselves ie interbreed with fertile offspring


THE COLIN LESLIE DEAN SPECIES PARADOX
The first humans Adam and Eve gave birth to Cain and Able
so who did Cain mate with

similarly
who did the first bird mate with who did the first dog mate with

an individual of species A gives birth to a individual of the new species B so who did this new individual of new species B mate with to continue the new species
either
1)there was no one to mate with- so how did the new species B become common
or
2)a whole lot of species A gave birth toa whole lot of new individuals of species B at the same time so that these new individual members of species B could mate together

if this 2) was the way it happened
we have a major problem
it would mean something made a whole lot of members of species A give birth to a whole lot new members of species B at the same time
we are told species form due to random mutations
so
it is beyound possibility that the same random mutation took place in a whole lot of different members of species A at the same time

the other alternative is that some intelligence was at work

NOW
There is a a dilemma
1)in order to resolve the dean paradox
the dean paradox makes you abandon the word species
in which case biology is destroyed

or
2)biology uses the word bird
signifying it is different from its parent organism
science uses the word species
as such
you have the dean paraodox

in order to resolve the dean paradox
the dean paradox makes you abandon the word species
in which case biology is destroyed
and all this talk in biology about speciation species this species that is meaningless nonsense
 
Last edited:
#2
Hi Meaninglessness, it seems you have started multiple separate threads on similar topics. Perhaps they would gain more focussed attention if grouped together into a single coherent thread on that theme.
 
#3
Hi M,

I agree with Typoz, please try to keep your stuff to one thread (preferably deleting other threads after you have copy/pasted your comments).

I don't think there is much interest in your posts, and in something like Gödel's completeness theorems, do you have the in depth understanding needed to discuss them?

David
 
Top