Andy Paquette, Mask Science, Big Lie? |523|

[Eric Newhill]

****
Do you know what is funny? I'm from Miami (so I do know what happened at the Bay of Pigs even met many "Cubans") and I do have Italian "mafia" in the family by marriage (we did not approve & did not associate) they have killed people. Then they go into legit businesses & the government.

I've worked in the government (ask me if I've talked with Nixon & Bebe Rebozo) yes, I was young but I knew psychopaths when I met them.

Jesus Eric. They will fuck you up, they will hire gang members just to skin you alive. Listen I do not doubt you believe in the NIST and probably the FBI, DOJ & CIA. Have you ever worked side by side with these people? How about the DEA? IRS? I have.

Ask me if the foot soldiers of these organizations ever took money off dead bodies or stole from the crime scenes? But then it might break your heart to know even firemen stole in front of me. I always yelled & told them to put it all back, only to have the backup take the money & or jewelry, anything they could.

I'm sorry Eric, I really am. I had to find this out early. I don't know what is worse finding out late, early, or never. I wish I could be like you in the "never" section. I just keep telling myself I've seen worse (history) just so I don't hate mankind. I listen to people like Alex & most of his guests to believe there are still good men in this world.

One more thing........even the mafia, vicious ruthless animals that they are, have rules. They don't kill police or judges. They don't kill women or children.

if you think that some psychopath running some department could find a large of "soldiers" that would blow up building and kill thousands of Americans - all the while coordinating terrorists to crash hijacked airplanes into he same buildings and, moreover, no one spilled the beans, then I'm afraid you're out of touch with reality.

 

[Eric Newhill]

****
Wait a second friend, I appreciate then you do know something about "things" & how to run an operation. First off you don't know what I know or feel about Kennedy or 9/11. Both are suspect. Both.

Why wasn't Trump killed? I wondered that myself, I imagine he might have some agreements. Walk away or die could be one. He came up with the rushed vac's he did put Fauci in place. Could be for exposure or could be he's in. I don't know. He was in construction so... and N.Y..

Hey, we're pals actually speaking of Detroit. Then you know Zerilli (Joe & Anthony). Welcome to the family. ;-)

It's because they don't kill presidents. It's too hard politically. You'd be caught. Someone would flip.

there is no reason the most parsimonious explanation for Kennedy's killing isn't correct. Oswald, a psycho himself, wanted to be a hero to the Soviets. He had motive and opportunity. The shots he made were easy. Anyone with some training could have done that numerous times throughout Kennedy's presidency because back then security wasn't that secure.

 

[Andrew Paquette]

Just a reminder; the reason the word "conspiracy" is relevant is because it is a chargeable offense in some circumstances. It wouldn't be if it didn't happen. So, two guys conspire to rob a jewelry store. That's conspiracy. Ten guys conspire to sell cigarette cartons without the tax stamp. It happens all the time. If a prosecutor has a "conspiracy theory", it only means he has a theory about how conspiracy might explain the set of facts he is working with. If he is confident that conspiracy is an element, it is added as a separate chargeable offense.

The term "conspiracy theory", like "discrimination", "racism", "sanction" and others, has come into common usage with a totally different meaning. My impression is that these words and the term "conspiracy theory" have to some extent become unsalvageable because how and how often they have been misused.

Just as one can make accusations that prove true, other accusations may be proved false. Or, a middle ground may be found where they are partly true or indeterminate. The same is true of genuine conspiracy theory. To theorize that the 9/11 attacks were the product of a conspiracy has considerable evidence to support it. The issue is who did the conspiring? There is the "conspiracy of Islamists" conspiracy vs. the "conspiracy of American officials" version. Both are conspiracy theories. One has much more evidence to support it that the other. The one with less evidence has more theories instead. In other words, weak support (in my view).

When it comes to the use of masks, mask mandates, and vaccine mandates, there is the conspiracy theory that all of these things have been pushed on the world's population by nefarious unknown people with a hidden agenda. The alternative is that there is no conspiracy to push false information about covid to encourage the worthless exercise of wearing irritating masks while restricting many other freedoms so that we are compliant when asked to be "vaccinated".

The key to determining the difference between these two alternatives is whether the information about the dangers of covid, the efficacy of mask wearing, social distancing, and the vaccines are true. If those things are true, then it may not be a conspiracy but a natural and appropriate response, worldwide, to the same stimuli. On the other hand, if the information is false, particularly if it is known to be false by the people pushing the narrative, then the conspiracy is more likely to be real.

From what I've seen, it is clear that:
1) The information provided by various governments, the CDC, WHO, NIH, politicians, celebrities and others regarding the covid cluster of phenomena are false.
2) At a minimum, the people driving the effort to misinform the public are aware that the information is false. That makes them liars.
3) It is unclear at what point downstream the false information is promulgated by people who honestly believe it. My impression is that the group could be described as "media consumers".

Because these narratives are provably false, the truth is actively suppressed, and that people in a position to immediately halt the spread of false information don't do it, it seems to me that in this case, a conspiracy is the most logical explanation for the fact pattern.

Hint: one doesn't usually curtail the spread of truth as if one's life dependent on it unless 1) you are lying and 2) you are somehow benefitting from the lie but others will not (the lie consumers).

 

[Atlantis]

Wanderer, EXACTLY. From the start it looked like the Feline coronavirus (FIP form) to me. I was working with a PCR lab (for animals) with rare cats I got out of Russia & Ukraine. Early in 2000 (in animal world) the vets all put coronavirus in one pot. BUT, as PCR came along we could break this out into many different diseases. Some treatable, some not. It makes a big difference when breeding rare exotic animals. Could you cure it? Or did you have to put the breeder down? Did you risk putting it with other rare cats or put it down (because it would infect the rest).

It's weird because I got in touch with the head researcher at Stanford in regards to amyloids as well. He didn't know amyloids were in cats, I told him YES, in dogs & even the Queens swans. He was a researcher for amyloids (MS).

Get this, as a researcher, he said amyloids were a rare disease. I told him hell no, it's common & it's going to be found to be at the base of a lot of diseases. Heart disease, infertility, brain problems. AND dig this, amyloids is a CLOTTING problem. It's a misfolding of the protein which then travels the body & clumps together. When it settles on an organ it will deform it, making it not work properly. Same as this C-19. Clotting.

I just haven't had time to look into this vaccine & how it works, I mean I know the basics, but does it produce or hook onto proteins in the body?

If interested I found this video (I saw it back in 2005/they must have updated but looks the same): https://www.oneamyloidosisvoice.com/video-visual/amyloidosis-awareness-narrated-by-michael-york/

 

[Atlantis]

Just a reminder; the reason the word "conspiracy" is relevant is because it is a chargeable offense in some circumstances. It wouldn't be if it didn't happen. So, two guys conspire to rob a jewelry store. That's conspiracy. Ten guys conspire to sell cigarette cartons without the tax stamp. It happens all the time. If a prosecutor has a "conspiracy theory", it only means he has a theory about how conspiracy might explain the set of facts he is working with. If he is confident that conspiracy is an element, it is added as a separate chargeable offense.

The term "conspiracy theory", like "discrimination", "racism", "sanction" and others, has come into common usage with a totally different meaning. My impression is that these words and the term "conspiracy theory" have to some extent become unsalvageable because how and how often they have been misused.

Just as one can make accusations that prove true, other accusations may be proved false. Or, a middle ground may be found where they are partly true or indeterminate. The same is true of genuine conspiracy theory. To theorize that the 9/11 attacks were the product of a conspiracy has considerable evidence to support it. The issue is who did the conspiring? There is the "conspiracy of Islamists" conspiracy vs. the "conspiracy of American officials" version. Both are conspiracy theories. One has much more evidence to support it that the other. The one with less evidence has more theories instead. In other words, weak support (in my view).

When it comes to the use of masks, mask mandates, and vaccine mandates, there is the conspiracy theory that all of these things have been pushed on the world's population by nefarious unknown people with a hidden agenda. The alternative is that there is no conspiracy to push false information about covid to encourage the worthless exercise of wearing irritating masks while restricting many other freedoms so that we are compliant when asked to be "vaccinated".

The key to determining the difference between these two alternatives is whether the information about the dangers of covid, the efficacy of mask wearing, social distancing, and the vaccines are true. If those things are true, then it may not be a conspiracy but a natural and appropriate response, worldwide, to the same stimuli. On the other hand, if the information is false, particularly if it is known to be false by the people pushing the narrative, then the conspiracy is more likely to be real.

From what I've seen, it is clear that:
1) The information provided by various governments, the CDC, WHO, NIH, politicians, celebrities and others regarding the covid cluster of phenomena are false.
2) At a minimum, the people driving the effort to misinform the public are aware that the information is false. That makes them liars.
3) It is unclear at what point downstream the false information is promulgated by people who honestly believe it. My impression is that the group could be described as "media consumers".

Because these narratives are provably false, the truth is actively suppressed, and that people in a position to immediately halt the spread of false information don't do it, it seems to me that in this case, a conspiracy is the most logical explanation for the fact pattern.

Hint: one doesn't usually curtail the spread of truth as if one's life dependent on it unless 1) you are lying and 2) you are somehow benefitting from the lie but others will not (the lie consumers).

***
Love you Andrew and something else... we can't be put aside by people who bring up the Kennedy assassination, 9/11, ghost & whatnot. That's over. Unfinished business yes, but right now, we're facing this COVID thing. It's killing people, dividing people, families, killing business & NOW in politics.

We shouldn't be drawn away (like I get) with that, we have to stop this insanity & lies about the masks. The masks are to remind people the Boogieman is out there to get ya. That's BS, it was used to scare people. Just like CNN's "death counter" that stopped after Biden got in.

The flu might be out there to get ya if you don't wash your hands & take your vitamins.

 

[Atlantis]

It's because they don't kill presidents. It's too hard politically. You'd be caught. Someone would flip.

there is no reason the most parsimonious explanation for Kennedy's killing isn't correct. Oswald, a psycho himself, wanted to be a hero to the Soviets. He had motive and opportunity. The shots he made were easy. Anyone with some training could have done that numerous times throughout Kennedy's presidency because back then security wasn't that secure.

***
Hon...people DID flip with the Kennedy thing & they got themselves killed. Oswald was a fruitcake but he was also "a patsy".

In regards to "the Soviets" & Russians for that matter, they are very loyal to their country. Someone like President Putin would despise anyone from the U.S. being disloyal to the U.S.. This would make Oswald also an idiot.

 

[Eric Newhill]

Just a reminder; the reason the word "conspiracy" is relevant is because it is a chargeable offense in some circumstances. It wouldn't be if it didn't happen. So, two guys conspire to rob a jewelry store. That's conspiracy. Ten guys conspire to sell cigarette cartons without the tax stamp. It happens all the time. If a prosecutor has a "conspiracy theory", it only means he has a theory about how conspiracy might explain the set of facts he is working with. If he is confident that conspiracy is an element, it is added as a separate chargeable offense.

The term "conspiracy theory", like "discrimination", "racism", "sanction" and others, has come into common usage with a totally different meaning. My impression is that these words and the term "conspiracy theory" have to some extent become unsalvageable because how and how often they have been misused.

Just as one can make accusations that prove true, other accusations may be proved false. Or, a middle ground may be found where they are partly true or indeterminate. The same is true of genuine conspiracy theory. To theorize that the 9/11 attacks were the product of a conspiracy has considerable evidence to support it. The issue is who did the conspiring? There is the "conspiracy of Islamists" conspiracy vs. the "conspiracy of American officials" version. Both are conspiracy theories. One has much more evidence to support it that the other. The one with less evidence has more theories instead. In other words, weak support (in my view).

When it comes to the use of masks, mask mandates, and vaccine mandates, there is the conspiracy theory that all of these things have been pushed on the world's population by nefarious unknown people with a hidden agenda. The alternative is that there is no conspiracy to push false information about covid to encourage the worthless exercise of wearing irritating masks while restricting many other freedoms so that we are compliant when asked to be "vaccinated".

The key to determining the difference between these two alternatives is whether the information about the dangers of covid, the efficacy of mask wearing, social distancing, and the vaccines are true. If those things are true, then it may not be a conspiracy but a natural and appropriate response, worldwide, to the same stimuli. On the other hand, if the information is false, particularly if it is known to be false by the people pushing the narrative, then the conspiracy is more likely to be real.

From what I've seen, it is clear that:
1) The information provided by various governments, the CDC, WHO, NIH, politicians, celebrities and others regarding the covid cluster of phenomena are false.
2) At a minimum, the people driving the effort to misinform the public are aware that the information is false. That makes them liars.
3) It is unclear at what point downstream the false information is promulgated by people who honestly believe it. My impression is that the group could be described as "media consumers".

Because these narratives are provably false, the truth is actively suppressed, and that people in a position to immediately halt the spread of false information don't do it, it seems to me that in this case, a conspiracy is the most logical explanation for the fact pattern.

Hint: one doesn't usually curtail the spread of truth as if one's life dependent on it unless 1) you are lying and 2) you are somehow benefitting from the lie but others will not (the lie consumers).

well said.

The obvious lie to me since early summer 2020 is that they push that we are all equally susceptible to covid and that we all need to be subjected to restricted freedoms for our safety. That notion was - and is - totally contrary to the data. We are not all at equal risk. Even the CDC data shows that. The elderly and infirm are at elevated risk from covid (as they are from the flu), but age 0 - 40 are not. There is a slight elevation of risk for ages 41 - 55. Those are the facts supported by all data. However, not the way it is presented to us by leaders like Fauci or by the media.

 

[Atlantis]

One more thing........even the mafia, vicious ruthless animals that they are, have rules. They don't kill police or judges. They don't kill women or children.

if you think that some psychopath running some department could find a large of "soldiers" that would blow up building and kill thousands of Americans - all the while coordinating terrorists to crash hijacked airplanes into he same buildings and, moreover, no one spilled the beans, then I'm afraid you're out of touch with reality.

***
omg. And here I was thinking you knew something. Sweetheart, they use "gangs" now for wet works. That IS the new mafia. Look let me give you some guidance here (then I'm done educating you on 9/11).

Go to the start of the operation (okay?). Where were the planes going? The financial (or what was seen as the financial capital), the pentagon & the one that crashed (Let's roll) was going to the White House.

See? The 3 main points, White House, Pentagon, Financial district. THIS was a government operation. It wasn't some nit in a cave.

For someone who knows how to run an operation, you missed that? Did you miss why the one going to the White House just flew around for hours & no fighter jet came? Do you find that odd? I mean the others had already hit the towers.

Gee, and there was Bush making sure the Bin Laden family got out of the country while we were on total flight lockdown. Eh, I never thought that was a deal, I can understand people would blame them & come for them.

The deal was Bush wanted into Iraq, hence your weapons of mass destruction lie then he used 9/11 for that aim.

Look 9/11 is an entire book we are not going to rewrite here. But one thing is sure, this wasn't carried out by some freak in a cave alone. He had a LOT of help with some government. Whose? I won't swear on a Bible which one(s).

And Epstein did not kill himself and we DIDN'T leave the weapons behind in Iraq by accident.

 

[Atlantis]

well said.

The obvious lie to me since early summer 2020 is that they push that we are all equally susceptible to covid and that we all need to be subjected to restricted freedoms for our safety. That notion was - and is - totally contrary to the data. We are not all at equal risk. Even the CDC data shows that. The elderly and infirm are at elevated risk from covid (as they are from the flu), but age 0 - 40 are not. There is a slight elevation of risk for ages 41 - 55. Those are the facts supported by all data. However, not the way it is presented to us by leaders like Fauci or by the media.

***********
What I'm wondering is why the BIG PUSH now? The mandates? The lockdowns? Is there something else coming? Or are they afraid the scare won't last?

Why does the military have until Nov.1 to get it or be discharged without the benefits they worked for. AS WELL as retired military benefits and the civilian DOD has until Nov 22. Hundreds of thousands of our military haven't gotten it.

Give that a thought. All of a sudden 1/3 of your military gets the boot WITHOUT benefits. But, hey I'm just a "conspiracy theorist". CAUSE IT KEEPS COMING TRUE.

over & out.

 

[Andrew Paquette]

***********
What I'm wondering is why the BIG PUSH now? The mandates? The lockdowns? Is there something else coming? Or are they afraid the scare won't last?

Why does the military have until Nov.1 to get it or be discharged without the benefits they worked for. AS WELL as retired military benefits and the civilian DOD has until Nov 22. Hundreds of thousands of our military haven't gotten it.

Give that a thought. All of a sudden 1/3 of your military gets the boot WITHOUT benefits. But, hey I'm just a "conspiracy theorist". CAUSE IT KEEPS COMING TRUE.

over & out.

I'm very concerned that most of our military has been taken out by the vaccine. They may have survived it for now but who knows how long that will last? Even if it simply reduces their battle efficacy by 20% or so, that is a serious problem.

My guess is that the big push is because the people pushing know they can't keep up the pretense much longer. There will be too many deaths, too many injuries, too many questions with ridiculous and obviously false answers. At that point, they've lost their opportunity. They're trying to do as much damage in the time they've got as they can. Once people wake up to what happened, they won't just stop following orders, they're going to turn on the bad guys.

The sickest part of this whole thing is that they're going after little kids. They know kids aren't in any risk group and that the vaccine poses more risk to them than anyone else. We think pedophiles are the scum of the earth. What of monsters who would kill children by deceiving their parents and caregivers into doing it for them? I have a hard time coming up with something worse than that. Deceiving mothers and fathers to get their kids "vaccinated" for their safety, and then to watch them die or suffer serious injuries. The bad guys not only instigated the child's death murder and the grief felt by parent's over those deaths, but the bottomless sorrow of knowing they cooperated in the death of those they cherished the most. And then the bad guys (Fauci, Biden, Harris etc) have the nerve to smile and laugh like so many gremlins in the dark, happy that we committed their crimes willingly, then felt the worst and blackest remorse possible, while they gained whatever it is they hope to gain in this macabre exercise of evil.

 

[drichardson]

The masks are also a very measurable metric of level of societal compliance. Worse, non-masking is a reliable way to identify non-compliant citizens and put them on the list.

I see things very differently.

Selfishness is the root of all evils, large and small. The 7 deadly sins? All varieties of selfishness. As nation, we have become markedly more selfish over the past few years.

Sometime last year, a truck passed me on the highway. Judging by how quickly it moved past me, I'd say it was going over 70 in a 45 zone. After they few past, they tossed two large drink containers out of the driver's side window. I'd never seen someone shamelessly litter like that before, let alone while going more than 20mph over the posted limit! At the time, it was shocking enough to take note.

This year, not only have I read countless articles about the recent speeding epidemic, I've noticed a shocking increase in roadside litter. The extraordinary has become commonplace.

Both speeding and littering are, in just about every case, acts of pure selfishness. They're not the only ones, however, as there are many other ways selfishness has begun to manifest.

In situations where masks are expected, when I see someone not wearing a mask, or wearing one incorrectly, it doesn't say to me that that person is merely "non-compliant". Not at all. It tells me that they're selfish.

See, I don't wear a mask because I'm afraid or because I'm "compliant". I'm about as far from that as you can get! No, I wear a mask because it's the right thing to do. That's the case for most masked people, in fact. I costs us nothing, and wearing a mask makes people who might be uneasy or afraid feel more comfortable when they're around us. If masks were completely useless, that reason alone would make wearing a mask worthwhile.

We do a lot of things for the benefit of others. It's why we have standards of dress and hygiene, after all. (Sure, you may personally benefit good grooming, but the primary purpose is the comfort and safety of those around you.) Businesses post rules about dress to ensure that all of their customers feel comfortable and safe. You wouldn't go in to a store that requires a shirt and shoes barefoot and bare-chested, would you? Of course not! That would be rude and disrespectful. Wearing a mask incorrectly, or not at all, is no different.

Now, there are people who don't wear masks to intentionally upset people. Some even with the intent to spread disease! I liken these people to the guys who harass bicyclers by "rolling coal" when they drive past to watch them choke on their exhaust. More than just rude, when someone intentionally seeks to cause harm to others, either physically or psychologically, they're a bad person.

That's what the masked and unmasked say to me.

 

[drichardson]

I'm very concerned that most of our military has been taken out by the vaccine. They may have survived it for now but who knows how long that will last? Even if it simply reduces their battle efficacy by 20% or so, that is a serious problem.

That doesn't make any sense to me at all. Why would we want to weaken our own military? We also just massively increased the defense budget. If our goal was to weaken the military, we're not doing a very good job!

Also, how long before you expect a massive die-off? I first saw this back in March and the predicted catastrophe never happened. I have no idea if the person who posted it changed their minds, but I highly doubt it. You were wise to give yourself a convenient 'out' when the majority of our military doesn't drop dead in the next year -- you can say it was just a totally-unnoticeable-to-civilians 20% reduction in "battle efficacy".

Though I have to wonder what a reduction in "battle efficacy" would mean in terms of modern warfare. It's not like we're fighting over hills like it's WWI.

My pregnant wife and I are getting boosters in a few weeks. I was told by the same group that the vaccine prevents conception and that it will terminate a pregnancy early on. We got the vaccine before we knew she was pregnant. The baby is perfectly healthy and due before the end of the year.

What on earth makes you think the vaccine is going to kill people? It just doesn't make any sense. What possible purpose could that serve?

 

[EllisR]

I see things very differently.

Selfishness is the root of all evils, large and small. The 7 deadly sins? All varieties of selfishness. As nation, we have become markedly more selfish over the past few years.

Sometime last year, a truck passed me on the highway. Judging by how quickly it moved past me, I'd say it was going over 70 in a 45 zone. After they few past, they tossed two large drink containers out of the driver's side window. I'd never seen someone shamelessly litter like that before, let alone while going more than 20mph over the posted limit! At the time, it was shocking enough to take note.

This year, not only have I read countless articles about the recent speeding epidemic, I've noticed a shocking increase in roadside litter. The extraordinary has become commonplace.

Both speeding and littering are, in just about every case, acts of pure selfishness. They're not the only ones, however, as there are many other ways selfishness has begun to manifest.

In situations where masks are expected, when I see someone not wearing a mask, or wearing one incorrectly, it doesn't say to me that that person is merely "non-compliant". Not at all. It tells me that they're selfish.

See, I don't wear a mask because I'm afraid or because I'm "compliant". I'm about as far from that as you can get! No, I wear a mask because it's the right thing to do. That's the case for most masked people, in fact. I costs us nothing, and wearing a mask makes people who might be uneasy or afraid feel more comfortable when they're around us. If masks were completely useless, that reason alone would make wearing a mask worthwhile.

We do a lot of things for the benefit of others. It's why we have standards of dress and hygiene, after all. (Sure, you may personally benefit good grooming, but the primary purpose is the comfort and safety of those around you.) Businesses post rules about dress to ensure that all of their customers feel comfortable and safe. You wouldn't go in to a store that requires a shirt and shoes barefoot and bare-chested, would you? Of course not! That would be rude and disrespectful. Wearing a mask incorrectly, or not at all, is no different.

Now, there are people who don't wear masks to intentionally upset people. Some even with the intent to spread disease! I liken these people to the guys who harass bicyclers by "rolling coal" when they drive past to watch them choke on their exhaust. More than just rude, when someone intentionally seeks to cause harm to others, either physically or psychologically, they're a bad person.

That's what the masked and unmasked say to me.

I'm with you. And I think that's what confuses me. I still don't understand what the fuss is about. Even if you're not convinced that it's useful, it's a trivial ask. The whole grand narrative about "good and evil" and our "government overlords" is beyond bizarre over something like this. All I see when I see people wearing masks is "I'm trying to be nice" or "I'm trying to be safe". When I see people without masks or wearing chin diapers I might see, "I would rather die (figuratively, but maybe literally) than be nice" (although, mostly I give them the benefit of the doubt). Even if mask wearing signals "compliance", it shows compliance with kindness and safety, not compliance with throwing safety out the window and passively accepting a drug likely to result in wholesale slaughter.

 

[titania]

My pregnant wife and I are getting boosters in a few weeks. I was told by the same group that the vaccine prevents conception and that it will terminate a pregnancy early on. We got the vaccine before we knew she was pregnant. The baby is perfectly healthy and due before the end of the year. What on earth makes you think the vaccine is going to kill people? It just doesn't make any sense. What possible purpose could that serve?

So you keep her away from cats and coffee, but an experimental gene therapy is ok? You drank the koolaid. You have stockholm syndrome. Big brother is not your friend.

What part of "It's Genocide" don't you understand?

• Dr. Peter Breggin - "We are the prey"
  • https://seed151.bitchute.com/CBf3vMP25MV7/K9GGR5whlfu6.mp4
• Dr. Vladimir Zelenko - "Modern Holocaust"
  • https://seed126.bitchute.com/vBEqxcyTQvca/znld5Z5nhkgo.mp4
• Dr. David Martin - "They patented Genocide"
  • https://zbbb278hfll091.bitchute.com/vBEqxcyTQvca/6MS6wiOFb3dI.mp4
• Dr. Bryan Ardis - "Standard of Care Murder"
  • https://seed171.bitchute.com/gh6mG8k0Vxr0/jrWzPjMnqo5o.mp4

 

[Ted]

Thank you for another great program. I (of course) had to calm down before posting as I know (and have known) what is going on. It is an agenda. For ANY thinking person, we can sit quietly with their own knowledge & research and know this.

Yes, it was so confusing at first, how could they pull this off? When I talked to people in other countries I was kind of shocked at how many would just take what America (USA media) said as the Gospel truth. I mean, don’t they have their own scientist telling them? Their own doctors? Their own media? Apparently not (Thank you David for “The old man in the chair”); he is spot on.

So, what do we have here & how bad is it? 2nd answer first: IT’S “F”ing BAD! It’s real bad. 1st answer: We have an agenda.

The mask is = to building 7. It’s the “tell”. Anyone that can read or research or pass the 6th grade KNOWS masks are not going to help. The fact that some countries now TELL their populations to wear a mask INSIDE their own homes. They even tell them to wear 2 or 3. For God's sake people.

So why (?) was my question & I don’t know if I have the entire picture, but if we look at their past moves, this would be to take & cover. To cover up something else going on AND there must be more than one Bill Gates in trouble. Otherwise, some of the other 2%’s would be screaming by now how much they’ve lost. Unless again, if they too knew.

We have to stop these mother “F”ers. Sorry, I actually used to never cuss but Alex got me going Seriously people. We have to stop them. Even if it is to post to one popular podcast. Like I like to go to CNN or the FBI facebook page & tell people where to go to find information. If we can get just one person to see, we’ve done something.

Alex one of your recent past guests wondered if he should bother to continue telling the truth to rock heads. My answer is yes. Try to be polite & calm so they will listen.

What are we up against? Our own doctors are having people wear masks to see them. My doctor took people’s temp. before entering & IF you dared have a fever she would send you automatically to the hospital. Now, she has actually been a long-time personal friend, so I excused her (and only use her to fill any Rx I want). But this time, no. I tried talking to her & she bristled & tried to escape me, she finally said, “Look I can’t lose my license, I have to do what they tell us.” JESUS CHRIST (yeah I’m angry). Coward. Further, she said she would give the same instructions… that freaking remdesivir & incubate! WTF? For a fever!?

And that vaccine… what do we know? 10,000 dead? And that is only what is reported. Didn’t we stop other vaccines (that are not gene modifiers) for like 36 deaths? What is going on here? Is it too crazy to ask if they actually want us dead? That’s how they are acting.

Back in March 2020, my grown kids asked me what I thought. Well, I said, “we are at war, they just haven’t told us.” I’m pretty sure I’m right. Who we are fighting & what about? I have no idea.

We have to be careful though. Because these are not really stupid people, they do think (like all psychopaths we are stupid/so that is helpful) but if we get too out there w/information… they will spray us.

Like Bill Gates said about Epstein, “Well, he’s dead.” LOL

And Biden:”Biden Mandates Vaccines for Workers, saying, “Our patience is wearing thin.”

Who the “F” is “OUR”??? Who is he talking for? This we or our? Does he have a mouse in his pocket? He’s a bad man, he’s a very bad man.

Why? ...
Why did Claudia Lopez (mayor) shut down Bogota
For so many months bankrupting at least half the small businesses effectively creating hundreds of thousands of unemployed? Because she's saving us.
This power grabbing idea; SHE ALREADY HAD THE POWER. To consolidate more? More power with less tax revenue?
Hitler with his gene thing, creating the superior race - he no doubt thought he has doing a good thing, survival of the fittest, 'and look guys we are the fittest'... creating the super race.
And for those who have no inner guidance, they will believe whatever THEY say.

We're all in this plane yelling at at each other over the precious data ,facts. But you know fellas, it's on auto-pilot..a program, and we know where that plane is going because perhaps we've been here before.

Why?
Because that's what some programs do. We are - meat puppets in a meaningless universe - is a auto destruction program.
Covid , contrary to popular opinion , did not come from a lab or a monkey (bat?) it came from a a idea, a World View.

And PLEASE don't gun the engine.. I'm only trying to help!

 

[EllisR]

well said.

The obvious lie to me since early summer 2020 is that they push that we are all equally susceptible to covid and that we all need to be subjected to restricted freedoms for our safety. That notion was - and is - totally contrary to the data. We are not all at equal risk. Even the CDC data shows that. The elderly and infirm are at elevated risk from covid (as they are from the flu), but age 0 - 40 are not. There is a slight elevation of risk for ages 41 - 55. Those are the facts supported by all data. However, not the way it is presented to us by leaders like Fauci or by the media.

We are all equally susceptible to COVID. And in a pandemic, we are all equally likely to contribute to the spread of COVID. I think you mean, we are not equally susceptible to symptomatic disease, severe disease or death. But then, I'm not sure of your point. Because this is the information coming from the CDC, Fauci and the media. Recommendations for reducing harm include reducing spread, as well as reducing severe disease or death. It sounds like the problem is that you haven't listened or read carefully and you misunderstood the message, not that anyone is pushing incorrect information.

 

[David Bailey]

The first question is, what is COVID?

Like AIDS, it's not one thing. The authorities have made every symptom or collection of symptoms COVID, and they have made no symptoms COVID with fraudulent use of the PCR method.

So, the flu could be COVID, and maybe that's why there were only 600 flu deaths in 2020 when they average like 60,000 in previous years.

There's a version of COVID called 'Long-COVID'. It's symptoms look just like Neurasthenia, or Chronic Fatigue, or Gulf War Syndrome, or Lyme Disease.

So far so good, but I frequent a blog run by the VERY skeptical Dr Kendrick, and he thinks we ar dealing with a distinct disease - recognisable by what it does in severe cases. There is also the probable fact that Fauci funded 'gain of function' research (which means making viruses more lethal) in China's Wuhan lab.

Mind you, I am prepared to believe that COVID-19 turned out to be less awful than was anticipated, and all the hype is designed to make up for that.

And, if you consider, as do I, that artificial polarized radiation, like cell phone EMF, is toxic, then old and new cell phone systems cause respiratory illness.

Well one reason that I doubt that wifi frequencies - including 5G - is that you would really expect that some hotspots - such as computer repair shops where PCs are often powered up without their electronics exposed - would shed a lot of staff with illness - has that ever been reported?

The other thing is that 5G is condemned because it can excite oxygen molecules into an excited state with somewhat different chemical properties which might indeed be toxic. However, I'd have thought this problem would have already come up in various contexts. More to the point, is the 5G covers a vast chunk of spectrum and the bottom frequency is something like 5GHz, whereas you need 60 GHz to cause the oxygen interaction. Furthermore, I have seen it pointed out that the top end of the band - 60 GHz isn't likely to be useful, precisely because the radiation would be absorbed and scattered by atmospheric oxygen.

Even before the release of the latest generation of cell phone technology, the earlier generations have been wreaking havoc to cellular metabolism through an effect called Voltage Gated Calcium Channel activation.

Cell phone and WiFi power levels far exceed levels necessary to open the cell membranes and flood the cells with calcium ions. So says Dr. Martin Pall.

EMF disturbs the microbiome in our gut as well. That results in all manner of illness.

So, name your poison!

Again I am sceptical. Everyone uses cell phones and wifi, and if they had been toxic and mimicked COVID, I'd have expected this to have manifested itself gradually over the years.

I have wondered if what really happens is that some people who get 'COVID symptoms' then get tested by faulty/fake PCR tests, and get scared into entering the hospital, where they catch some other disease that is never recognised because once they have a positive COVID reading no other diagnosis is considered.

However, I have some sympathy with the concept that viruses are often blamed for things that have other causes. Polio was a problem in the summer when some pretty toxic chemicals were inuse, and those chemicals were found to be capable of causing paralysis, and polio was notable in that only about 1 in 200 went on from the early flu like symptoms to get paralysis. We had a corn field behind our house, and that could have given me polio symptoms (don't worry, mine was a fairly light case) - I don't know.

The AIDS situation is extraordinarily suspicious, and Fauci was involved!

David

 

[David Bailey]

That doesn't make any sense to me at all. Why would we want to weaken our own military? We also just massively increased the defense budget. If our goal was to weaken the military, we're not doing a very good job!

Also, how long before you expect a massive die-off? I first saw this back in March and the predicted catastrophe never happened. I have no idea if the person who posted it changed their minds, but I highly doubt it. You were wise to give yourself a convenient 'out' when the majority of our military doesn't drop dead in the next year -- you can say it was just a totally-unnoticeable-to-civilians 20% reduction in "battle efficacy".

Though I have to wonder what a reduction in "battle efficacy" would mean in terms of modern warfare. It's not like we're fighting over hills like it's WWI.

My pregnant wife and I are getting boosters in a few weeks. I was told by the same group that the vaccine prevents conception and that it will terminate a pregnancy early on. We got the vaccine before we knew she was pregnant. The baby is perfectly healthy and due before the end of the year.

What on earth makes you think the vaccine is going to kill people? It just doesn't make any sense. What possible purpose could that serve?

If people fool about with novel vaccines that haven't been adequately tested, anything might happen. Also wait till people have had their 20th booster shot of vaccine - my guess is they may not be feeling too good.

The concept that this is about population reduction seems to have started from Bill Gates and the Reset21 crowd who have publicly discussed the desirability of lowering the world population to about 1 billion.

My partner and I are in our 70's (so potentially much more vulnerable) and have not had any shots of the vaccine.

David

 

[ShaneTheThinker]

Trying to explain to a slave that he IS a slave is an impossible task. Let him wear his little filthy ritualistic shame muzzle and get all the poisonous jabs he wants. Screw these miserable, soulless freaks who just don't realize how evil they are. Let's make no mistake: it's because of their compliance the world turned overnight into a huge GULAG, no, actually far more nightmarish than the GULAG or the totalitarian USSR of my childhood and youth. I thought the USSR was hell, and it was. What we are living through now is infinitely worse than that. At least, in the USSR nobody was trying to put a muzzle on my face, put me under lockdown, coerce me into taking an experimental DNA-changing chemical, or, for that matter, force me to accept every perversion known to man as something normal and even admirable, nobody was denigrating my ethnicity in the most revolting racist terms, nobody was subjecting my country to unopposed third-world invasion, etc, etc. So, I'd rather take the 70's USSR that the US or Wester Europe of today any day, and, as I said, the USSR WAS hell, only less horrific than the world we live in today. And every muzzle-clad moron is an accomplice of this horrifying nightmare. It's with their complicity that the world became what it is now. Here, in Spain where I live, the muzzled slaves were violently attacking the unmuzzled on the street (primarily women and the elderly, I never wore a muzzle at all through these dystopian times, not once, not for aminute, but, being 6'3 and athletic, I wasn't the subject of the slaves' ire. They are cowards, of course.) The hateful daily propaganda against the unvaccinated is absolutely brutal, in the media, politician's speeches, etc, the jabbed morons now refuse to socialize with the unvaxxed or even greet them on the street. For example, in my dog park the vaxx brigade turn their snouts away from me when I show up, knowing that I'm vocally anti-muzzle, anti-jab and anti-Cov-idiocy.
I'm afraid it's way past the debate time, it's us or them. The world is divided now into two camps. It's good vs. evil. There is no debating evil. You can not explain to a cannibal why exactly it's bad to eat humans, he simply won't understand. You can not explain to a slave that, if he wants to be a slave it's his choice, but if he tries to force me to be a slave, it's only natural that I resist, using every means at my disposal to avoid the enslavement. We gotta fight this. They are not gonna stop until they turn us into zombies. Most people will submit to this slavery: centuries of materialist indoctrination which denies any spirituality, transcendency of the human soul, claiming that a human being is nothing more than a meat robot who soils the face of the good Earth for a few years and then disappears forever turned the humanity into cowardly cynical sheeple, ready to be subjected to any type of humiliation and indignity just to be able to live one more day. Thos of us who are not part of this bipedal cattle will have to fight to the end. We will not submit.

Wow! I love all of what you wrote! I live in the state of Missouri, wasn't born and raised, but moved here. Most of my family lives in California. From what I hear from them, California is fucked! My older brother has worked for the SFPD for 26 years, and they told him that he needed the jab or they would not only fire him, but significantly cut his retirement benefits. My sisters husband, who works for the same police force, was told that he would be fired as well for not getting the jab. My brother has three kids, two off to college and one still at home. My sister has four children, all still young and living at home. How is this not considered something worse than draconian measures?

I have said it once and I will say it into infinity: if these vaccines are so SAFE and EFFECTIVE, why do the manufactures have complete legal immunity from any side effects? This is the question that we need to fucking ask. That answer is within that question! Hanging out with Sanjay Gupta and saying that "I told both my parents to get vaccinated, but I took ivermectin," is not the fucking answer. If anything, fuckin Joe Rogan is part of their solution, a kind of damage control.

 

[titania]

However, I have some sympathy with the concept that viruses are often blamed for things that have other causes. Polio was a problem in the summer when some pretty toxic chemicals were inuse, and those chemicals were found to be capable of causing paralysis, and polio was notable in that only about 1 in 200 went on from the early flu like symptoms to get paralysis.

Catherine Austin Fitts thinks "polio" was a cover story to cover up for widespread DDT poisoning. They reduced DDT usage as they increased vaccination. Double-Win!