HAHAHAHAHAHA :D
I said I'm giving up on you on this topic, Eric... but damn it, I just can't stand the temptation and will reply to you one more time.
This time, it is indeed the last one. Honestly. ;)
Eric, do you sincerely think you brought something I - or all other people from the 9/11 Truth movement - do not know already?
All 9/11 Truth is based on a highly detailed, evidence-and-reasoning-based criticisms of the NIST's interpretations -
interpretations, not facts - of the empirically established facts of the 9/11 events, which include free fall. You may see here the 9/11 Truth's refutations of the very exact interpretative statements you quoted above:
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/free-fall-acceleration
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence...911truth/101-free-fall-and-building-7-on-9-11
As it always goes with any "authority", it is effectively a con, a confidence trickstery based on proclaming one's controvertible interpretations "established facts" - which they are not.
I wouldn't waste my time explaining it to your average conspiracy denier. But what is so hilarious, even tragicomical, about you, Eric, is that you are an enthusiastic cospiracy theorist and a vehement conspiracy denier simultaneously. To be precise, you are a conspiracy theorist when you like the conspiracy theory being presented; but you turn into a conspiracy denier the very second someone present a conspiracy theory not so likeable to you. You willingly appeal to "authority", as all conspiracy deniers do, when you agree with its statements, as it in the case of the NIST and the 9/11 false flag; yet you willfully reject the "authority", as all conpiracy theorists do, as soon as it makes a statement with that you disagree, as it is in the case with the CDC and the Covid-1984.
And every time, you fail to see the sheer irony of your own self-contradicting and self-defying stance.
Unlike you, hardcore conpiracy deniers like Malf and Silence are, at least, consistent in their pro-establishment devotion and unwavering faith in the official "authorities" and their public claims - as well as I am consistent in my anti-establishment rebellion, rejecting all these "authorities" and all their claims without hypocritical selectivity. Your way is a blatant special pleading being elevated to the level of the method and the principle.
I leave the last word to you, if your will is to reply. I don't care about your replies anyway.