Robbedigital
New
Generally speaking,
I find depressing the lack of steel-manning of the Gloabalists’ narrative by otherwise genius thought leaders.
(Off the top of my head, me steel-manning the Globalist perspective)
Capitalism is steering the ship(Earth population) which is headed for an iceberg(global cataclysm). The ship is too big and to close to miss it by turning, so all who will survive must transfer to a smaller ship(build back better).
If the iceberg would otherwise kill ALL passengers, then the Globalists feel justified in whatsoever means is needed to shed those who won’t be transferring to the smaller ship.
Once you realize this is their perspective, it becomes silly to battle with them in semantics about the long term welfare of current ship.
Just had an epiphany.
The Free World vs. The Globalists is like an exhausted guilt-ridden parent trying to bargain with the defiant child who has locked-onto and is holding a piece of the parents' hypocrisy(or any given weakness) for ransom.
Until the parent reclaims their role as the guardian, the child must assume the responsibility however they perceive it.
Hence, all of this arguing about the ridiculousness of the Globalist plan, is in itself ridiculous. We (The Free World) are supposed to be the ones with the plan.