Search results

  1. C

    Daniel Pinchbeck, How Soon is Now, Heavy-Handed Climate Apocalypse Stuff |343|

    Not sure how I missed this episode until just now. Going back through archives. What a twit. He has zero understanding of modern history shouldn’t be trusted to groom himself. We are stuck.
  2. C

    What Happened at the 2017 IONS Conference |361|

    Your argument is somewhat compelling but it is kind of like saying that 911 couldn't have been an inside job because too many people would have had to keep the secret and it wouldn't be possible. It also sidesteps the main arguments for the idea that the moon landings were faked; the evidence...
  3. C

    Joseph Atwill, Why is the Deep State Interested in Psychedelics? |364|

    You I interviewed Corbett once and asked him what any of us could do, on an individual level to resist the Deep State. He gave me several things like; growing your own food, getting off the grid, not falling into the trap of mass consumerism, meditation, etc. that made a lot of sense. No need...
  4. C

    Cody Niconi just published: Ep022 - Deep State Psychedelics with Alex Tsakiris

    What's amazing to me is how many really bright people refuse to even consider any of the evidence re 911. My sister, Chief Medical Officer for one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world, recently called an email I sent her about building 7, "crackpot conspiracy". She and her ilk...
  5. C

    What Happened at the 2017 IONS Conference |361|

    Agree completely. I honestly expected that most listeners of this show would have already reached same conclusion. Calling Bart Sibrel a "wing nut"? Isn't that the same technique used to discredit say NDE researchers?
  6. C

    Brian Dunning, Is the “Skeptical Thing” Over? |363|

    Man, these guys SO get my dander up. I personally, got "over" jerks like these a couple years ago. It was difficult. I had furious email exchanges with a couple "well known skeptics" and it soon became obvious that they are incapable of rational, reasoned debate. They will ALWAYS resort to ad...
  7. C

    Daniel Pinchbeck, How Soon is Now, Heavy-Handed Climate Apocalypse Stuff |343|

    I felt the same way when Alex said he voted fo Hillary. To me, when one examines her positions and past actions, she is obvious a neo-con/war monger in the same vein as Bush and Obama. Funny; I too voted for Obama in '08 but soon realized he offered no real change. Trump is bombastic, arrogant...
  8. C

    He thought his beliefs about global warming were based on science. Science proved him wrong |310|

    Interesting that you would so confidently say that overpopulation is a "fact" much as Alex's friend Rick felt same about the 97%. The 1960s saw apocalyptic doom porn concerning overpopulation reach a frenzied crescendo with the release of Paul Erlich's book The Population Bomb that predicted...
  9. C

    Materialistic science makes us feel less human. He thinks the arts can change that |304|

    Alex, Be glad to. I do have his email. Thanks again for doing the interview with me on KSGF a few months back. Just sorry the producer had booked a bunch of other nonsense without telling me. Hope you can do it again and we can spend a full hour. As to volunteerism, yes. It's a freakin long...
  10. C

    Materialistic science makes us feel less human. He thinks the arts can change that |304|

    Your guest talks a lot about "social justice", white denialism and institutional racism from an historical perspective. As someone who believes in volunteerism, I abhor the idea of social justice. Social justice is an idea promulgated by Progressives. Progressivism Is the same philosophy that...
  11. C

    How I got duped by crop circle science. Nancy Talbott vs. Matt Williams

    The so called "critics" will never do his research because in their world, the issue is settled. As with NDEs (product of dying brain), UFOs (man made of swamp gas), EVPs (CB radio or paradelia) Bigfoot (misidentification), Crop Circles are ALL man made. If you've listened to this show, looked...
  12. C

    How I got duped by crop circle science. Nancy Talbott vs. Matt Williams

    Andrew, I agree. And I think the "he" is a "she" unless he is a he named "Nancy". It was strange that she seemed to dance around the thing a bit. She did finally mention the nodes but there was so much clutter in the rest of her dialogue it WAS hard to figure out.
  13. C

    How I got duped by crop circle science. Nancy Talbott vs. Matt Williams

    It seems simple to me but maybe I'm a simpleton! Claims are that the nodes in "non-human" crop circles have been heated by short bursts of energy (possible microwave) and that the nodes then expand or even blow out. Should be very simple to compare a known man made circle plant to a supposed...
Back
Top