radicalpolitik
New
That Dean Radin, a parapsychologist keeps running experiments that are not accepted by scientists, probably means there's nothing to it, and certainly does not constitute 'positive evidence'.
If they are in mainstream journals then that's a pretty good example of acceptance that something is happening, and besides, not accepting doesn't make it false. You are a prime example. And besides, you haven't actually read any of the papers and you are already making a snap judgement.
Journalists? Who would give them any credibility for anything?
I never mentioned journalists, either you misread or you were trying to goad.
The Nobel Committee looks at all sorts of stuff that I don't, so there's no catch-22.
To be honest, the nobel committee thing is a non-sequitor, again wether they accept it or not does not negate positive evidence, and again to reiterate, you haven't actually looked at it. You've gone, these people don't accept it, I won't bother. You call yourself a free thinker but you let others do it for you.
Sure, I'm biased, in favor of reality. I don't mind if people like to think things, feel things, make up things, etc. but it's different is they say it's true. Like the guy who says he met or talked to the holy ghost; I sure he believes it, but not even other christians do. If you though accept his anecdote though, I don't mind, just don't try to say ghosts are real.
Nice bit of self congratulatory intellectual masturbation there, With a subtle demeaning of people.
Last edited: