why don't you start a dialog with dr jeff long.
I guess I could try emailing him if I had his account name. Maintaining that database is a labor of love for sure and I can't say this concern rises to the occasion since I know so little about how it was designed.
However, I am pretty sure you should know the answer to this question which I feel is much more important.
1) How did Parnia infer in his 2014 aware study the timing of the veridical perception? I don't mean do we really know what should happen. I could care less about the materialist narrative. I want to know how the timing was inferred. The paper declares it true. I want to know why.
Btw, have you watched any recent farsight trailers on youtube? The latest one has his son on explaining how perplexed and upset their group of remote viewers were to discover evil aliens. It even says they are protecting us from information that seems very analogous to Roko's Basilisk (via the lesswrong cult created by Yudkowsky -- an proponent of transhumanism and funded by Peter Thiel). I've mentioned him before.
My point vis a vis farsight is this: if they simply had enough groups willing to open up and test them, simply getting the same answer to a question is impossible given the blinded protocol used. Yet they seem to claim to nearly always get it right. But remember what I told you about others who have tried remote viewing? Some believe its only possible if you frontload.
So it seems, since I don't think farsight is lying, they are extremely talented. My best guess as to why their information is so challenging is because they are simply getting back what they expect from their leader. But I got off topic didn't I?
All that really matters is the timing issue. I wish you would focus on that. You think its resolved. It's not, at least not compared to what we would want. At least not according to the normal standard. I don't mean the skeptical standard. Just tell me how he inferred it. I already know after 14 seconds you are dead according to materialism.
I want to be able to explain this science to other people and without the details no one will believe me.