LoneShaman
Member
Here is my stance. I don't know if man has been to the moon. Considering that there have been many intriguing samples that have come from the moon including samples of vitrification, concluding the moon has been subject to outburst from the Sun indicating super flare or mini nova events. I conclude that the lunar missions, and many other space missions were to establish something that has been covered up. That being that the Sun does indeed micro nova cyclically. These samples could also have been gathered by probes, but I believe they have been there, and probably are even now but it is not by the means that we know of. Yes I am suggesting a secret space program.
I spent 12 months analyzing the footage from one mission, Apollo 16. There are several conclusions. The footage is fake. The other options are that there is an atmosphere on the moon hence the sound, gravity varies and for some reason low gravity entails moving in slow motion at precise intervals of exacting frame rates. It also appears to make it difficult for astronauts to crouch but not jump.
For anyone interested here are my videos of that investigation. I discovered things that no one has ever done in the many decades of this theory. Depending on where you live you may not be able to view them, it was for sometime shadowed banned. I have had several conversations with people who have been unable to view them. I am not sure where this stands today. I have never had many views. So by all means check them out, You'll be helping me out. Much is explained in the videos. I saw no need to continue with it, it was very labor intensive and I no longer have the time. Perhaps one day I will analyze other missions frame by frame as I did this one.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKbJt1HaiCHAgCbmp0joUHQ/videos
This was my most significant discovery, as well as the extraction of the astronauts footsteps you can see in the larger audio analysis at the link above.
Confirmation of precise frame rates to account for gravitational effects. Here is my gravity analysis.
Here I have reversed engineered the footage by using precise frame rates to simulate lunar gravity. It is no coincidence that these frame rate are absolutely specific and work in every single case. There is also the existence of what is called a 3:5 pulldown. This occurs when regular film speed of 24 fps is converted to NTSC roughly 30 FPS resulting in a duplicate frame every 5th frame. The only possibility is that the original 30FPS was converted to film, losing 6 frames a second and then for some reason converted back again. The other possibility is simply a conversion of film speed to NTSC. About 80% of the footage is like this. The rest has different ratios that have basically mangled the actual time rate and is reconstructed with multiple duplicate frames. This is the industry I work in. This is my field of expertise. I also did extensive restoration of the footage, so you can enjoy a clarity that is magnitudes above that of the originals. Well actually there are no originals, they were taped over. And all the technology has also been lost.
Of course, this is the most common point that is brought up. Basically it never happened once in any other spacewalk for decades and has never ever recurred. Whilst on the surface the microphones operate in VOX mode, (voice operated). The sound inside the suit is not silent. There are cooling systems buzzing, air supply whistling and even the astronauts breath. There is a threshold level when the microphones are activated. the volume must be above all of the background noise of the suit in order to be activated. If the mere tapping of a rock is able to be transferred through layers of liquid filled tubing and layers of insulation and latex to then vibrate the air within the suit and helmet and then activate the microphone then nearly every single action would resonate inside the suit activating the microphone constantly. This does not happen and has never happened even with using hammers and high powered drills in the decades of actual spacewalks for installations and repairs. I have several real astronauts on record stating they absolutely do not hear a thing when using tools on space walks. including statements confirming that the suit does not act like a drum. So someone is lying here, and i do believe the actual astronauts conducting the installations and repairs in low Earth orbit.
We are talking about a minuscule amount of energy. Not only that but the point of contact is between the rover seat and the rock not the suit. The wave of energy is first absorbed into the rock itself and the seat. This is the tapping of a rock for Christ sake.
Despite all of this, it is all inconsequential as there is no contact with the suit in the many other sounds produced, such as the closing and opening of the seat. Yet another unsupported theory must be invented to account for that.
I spent 12 months analyzing the footage from one mission, Apollo 16. There are several conclusions. The footage is fake. The other options are that there is an atmosphere on the moon hence the sound, gravity varies and for some reason low gravity entails moving in slow motion at precise intervals of exacting frame rates. It also appears to make it difficult for astronauts to crouch but not jump.
For anyone interested here are my videos of that investigation. I discovered things that no one has ever done in the many decades of this theory. Depending on where you live you may not be able to view them, it was for sometime shadowed banned. I have had several conversations with people who have been unable to view them. I am not sure where this stands today. I have never had many views. So by all means check them out, You'll be helping me out. Much is explained in the videos. I saw no need to continue with it, it was very labor intensive and I no longer have the time. Perhaps one day I will analyze other missions frame by frame as I did this one.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKbJt1HaiCHAgCbmp0joUHQ/videos
This was my most significant discovery, as well as the extraction of the astronauts footsteps you can see in the larger audio analysis at the link above.
Confirmation of precise frame rates to account for gravitational effects. Here is my gravity analysis.
Here I have reversed engineered the footage by using precise frame rates to simulate lunar gravity. It is no coincidence that these frame rate are absolutely specific and work in every single case. There is also the existence of what is called a 3:5 pulldown. This occurs when regular film speed of 24 fps is converted to NTSC roughly 30 FPS resulting in a duplicate frame every 5th frame. The only possibility is that the original 30FPS was converted to film, losing 6 frames a second and then for some reason converted back again. The other possibility is simply a conversion of film speed to NTSC. About 80% of the footage is like this. The rest has different ratios that have basically mangled the actual time rate and is reconstructed with multiple duplicate frames. This is the industry I work in. This is my field of expertise. I also did extensive restoration of the footage, so you can enjoy a clarity that is magnitudes above that of the originals. Well actually there are no originals, they were taped over. And all the technology has also been lost.
This is not the place to discuss this, I post this because you have attempted to diminish my character by labeling me as a fringe conspiracy nut. You are getting desperate now Laird. Perhaps I am a fringe conspiracy theorist. In fact yes I am, but nether the less I bring actual evidence to support my claims, not just copy and pasted things but my own personal analysis. No one has been able to refute what I have discovered without having to defy the laws of physics, make of it what you will. I stand behind it. And I challenge NASA to get in their vacuum chamber and prove it! Or rather falsify it!Incidentally, re your first video analysing the sounds in the moon landing, which you embedded, I wonder whether you might consider that the objects which made the sounds were connected via an unbroken chain of matter to the astronauts' suits, such that the sound could have travelled to the microphones in their suits via that route? I haven't looked at the other video beyond the first few seconds.
Of course, this is the most common point that is brought up. Basically it never happened once in any other spacewalk for decades and has never ever recurred. Whilst on the surface the microphones operate in VOX mode, (voice operated). The sound inside the suit is not silent. There are cooling systems buzzing, air supply whistling and even the astronauts breath. There is a threshold level when the microphones are activated. the volume must be above all of the background noise of the suit in order to be activated. If the mere tapping of a rock is able to be transferred through layers of liquid filled tubing and layers of insulation and latex to then vibrate the air within the suit and helmet and then activate the microphone then nearly every single action would resonate inside the suit activating the microphone constantly. This does not happen and has never happened even with using hammers and high powered drills in the decades of actual spacewalks for installations and repairs. I have several real astronauts on record stating they absolutely do not hear a thing when using tools on space walks. including statements confirming that the suit does not act like a drum. So someone is lying here, and i do believe the actual astronauts conducting the installations and repairs in low Earth orbit.
We are talking about a minuscule amount of energy. Not only that but the point of contact is between the rover seat and the rock not the suit. The wave of energy is first absorbed into the rock itself and the seat. This is the tapping of a rock for Christ sake.
Despite all of this, it is all inconsequential as there is no contact with the suit in the many other sounds produced, such as the closing and opening of the seat. Yet another unsupported theory must be invented to account for that.
Last edited: