Richard Cox
Member
For example take the first preschooler from McMartin that reported being sexually abused. as I documented earlier in this thread, he was three years old at the time. he came home and was bleeding out of his backside. his mom took him to the pediatrician. the pediatrician suspected sexual abuse and referred him to emergency room. from there he was referred to a doctor who specialize in sexual abuse. Debbie Nathan does a lot of arm-waving to distract people away from these facts but she never challenges them... because they are just the medical facts of the case!
I literally just posted about Debbie Nathan’s challenges to that narrative. If you don’t think the diagnostic limitations of the time (which even Cheit acknowledges), Matthew Johnson’s Strep infection, Judy Johnson’s psychosis or Ross Cheit’s attempts to downplay that have any bearing, then yes, you can safely conclude Matthew was sodemised. It’s just not clear to me that these issues aren’t factors.
I think prosecution should follow the letter of the law, but in terms of me determining for myself what really happened many of the legalities are irrelevant (BTW
That’s not the point I was making. I’m saying you can conclude sexual abuse took place, but if Buckey was aquitted due to reasonable doubt, there’s no reason to suggest a conspiracy to squash the case. This is the exact opposite of my reading of the Franklin case.
* BTW may want to read the above Post in detail about all the additional information they found during an archaeological dig at McMartin years later... victims told them where to dig and what would find... they dug and found it... no legal tricks and shenanigans.
I don’t think you’re addressing my existing points so I won’t go on to the tunnels.
BTW2 she even defends the convicted pedo from the Glendale school (James Toward)
Do you have a reference for where Nathan has addressed the Toward case?