Scott Adams explains how the way you think about a problem can either hinder or help you find a solution. He predicts a coming "golden age" when we are able break out of our mental prisons and learn to solve problems that are problems of thinking not actual physical problems that require technology to solve.
Did you watch the Rubin video? Democrats have legislated against free speech... In addition they frequently silence individuals they disagree with, or do 'no platforming' to prevent people from speaking at all more and more frequently across school campuses and other locations.
I thought we were all on the same page here that both parties represent big money first and foremost.
left vs right is a joke and if there is a left, its certainly not interchangeable with democrats.
With things like the progressive stack being implemented in mainstream protests such as occupy and black lives matter I don't think you can claim that the 'left' isn't against free speech for they certainly believe in privileged speech.
You can read more about identity politics and the 'left' here - https://www.theguardian.com/society...tity-politics-went-from-inclusion-to-division
They use this report from the white house as the source- https://docs.house.gov/meetings/IG/IG00/20180322/108023/HRPT-115-1.pdf
Come on now, we both know the immigrants being protected in sanctuary cities are predominantly not white.
While I agree, its irrelevant that reps/cons do it too when the original claim you made is that democrats DON'T do thisI did watch the David Rubin video and found nothing that I haven’t heard already.Republicans/Conservatives also silence those they don’t want to hear.
Democrats/the Left are NOT against free speech.
They utilize the progressive stack.What does Black Lives Matter have to do with free speech?
Except they've done this to dozens of speakers now, sometimes even employing violence. We should all strive to an ideal culture of an open marketplace of ideas so that we can rationally address beliefs instead of pushing them to the sidelines to fester extremism. Also I don't see why we shouldn't be just as worried about corporate entities censorship as we are about government censorship when organizations like Google and Facebook have far more power over the realm of ideas.When the college kids protested against that one gentleman that they didn’t want speaking at their campus, conservatives got into an uproar.
There's no definition of right/left I agree with. My primary interests are government corruption and antiwar. I mostly use the wonderful Antiwar.com for my daily news, The Intercept and Wikileaks.I’m a progressive and a left wing person. I’m assuming you are a conservative and/or right leaning, like many others on this forum.
Okay, what would that look like?Now that’s out of the way, can we have a discussion about race WITHOUT bringing up sides?
Fair enough.To be honest, immigration isn’t my area of expertise nor our the sanctuary cities, so I can’t really discuss it until I look into it further when I have the time.
While I agree, its irrelevant that reps/cons do it too when the original claim you made is that democrats DON'T do this
They utilize the progressive stack.
Except they've done this to dozens of speakers now, sometimes even employing violence. We should all strive to an ideal culture of an open marketplace of ideas so that we can rationally address beliefs instead of pushing them to the sidelines to fester extremism. Also I don't see why we shouldn't be just as worried about corporate entities censorship as we are about government censorship when organizations like Google and Facebook have far more power over the realm of ideas.
There's no definition of right/left I agree with. My primary interests are government corruption and antiwar. I mostly use the wonderful Antiwar.com for my daily news, The Intercept and Wikileaks.
Okay, what would that look like?
Fair enough.
Another interesting site is https://www.rt.com/I checked out Antiwar.com and it’s actually a pretty good site. Surprised I’ve never heard of it, so thank you for introducing me to it.
Spot on - the definitions of Left and right have been cynically skewed in recent times in the hope that people who see themselves as left, can be sucked into some pretty nasty policies.There's no definition of right/left I agree with. My primary interests are government corruption and antiwar.
I checked out Antiwar.com and it’s actually a pretty good site. Surprised I’ve never heard of it, so thank you for introducing me to it.
That thumbnail unintentionally looks hilarious.I thought this was interesting...I offer it without comment:
-- except, perhaps, to say that this young woman seems to me to be talking a lot of sense and cheers me up enormously.
That thumbnail unintentionally looks hilarious.
the definitions of Left and right have been cynically skewed in recent times in the hope that people who see themselves as left, can be sucked into some pretty nasty policies.
the left (whom I traditionally associated with) no longer represent my values.
I thought this was interesting...I offer it without comment:
-- except, perhaps, to say that this young woman seems to me to be talking a lot of sense and cheers me up enormously.
False.He’s a dispacable human being who doesn’t know basic history and twists facts to represent his agenda.
Show us a video of Moly saying the things you claim.
You may want to do research before you claim I’m lying.
Here’s a response video to Stefan Molyneux’s “The Truth About the Native American Genocide by YouTuber, Shaun