This is where i got stuck too, Alex pulled up on that as well.Great interview. I always thhough that human consciousness was an interface between the 3D natural world and the higher spiritual world. Glad to hear it's not just me. I'll have to do some more reading about Ingo and his work.
"Alex Tsakiris: [00:37:49] Well, hold on, he throws that survival bullshit in there, because he has to kind of have any kind of credibility within his community. And then he has to throw in evolution too. But when you really push him, and we had a good conversation, you really push him towards the spiritual kind of all that falls away. And he goes, “Yeah, that’s bullshit.” It’s closer. I think, what he’s saying to what Ingo was saying, and what you I think, really beautifully brought into focus is this. I’m not sure tuning is the right word, but it’s close. But what you guys are saying you and Ingo are saying is that maybe there’s some relationship, some biophysical relationship between the quantum mechanics biology and this larger consciousness that allows us to kind of sync it up, in a way that makes it inexperienced that we’re having in the way that you’re talking about with Donald Hoffman?"
Later he goes on to say we have no needs other then the survival basics. But if this is true then why has man always, until just lately historically speaking, had god(s), religion, spirituality? Why bother with that shit when there's a deer to shoot.
In other words, we expierence what we expierence from the 'emerald realm' only that which pertains to survival according to nick and others theory.
I'll throw this out here, - meaning and questions concerning value are messy. Go there an you're bound to get mired, feet stuck in the mud, so why not just avoid it.
Or as alex says - it's a nod to the institutions.
In any case a sound interview. I read Zero Point and ill bet this one good too.
Last edited: