Syria and US aggression

I was trying to find out if it is plausible that the Syrian rebels could have sarin. The mainstream argument is that it would be too hard for the rebels to produce sarin, and it is a binary agent so Assad's explanation that Syria bombed a rebel chemical weapons factory doesn't hold up - it is unlikely that the rebels would have both components mixed in whatever facility was bombed.

The argument that it is too hard for the rebels to produce sarin might not be convincing if it was the rebels who used it in 2013 as some claim. I found some information that implies it was the rebels who used sarin in 2013 and other information saying they did not. So I am wondering if anyone knows of any sources they think are reliable that address that question?

References
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/05/middleeast/syria-sarin-chemical-weapons-explainer/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/05/middleeast/idlib-syria-attack/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghouta_chemical_attack#United_States
http://www.dw.com/en/is-assad-to-blame-for-the-chemical-weapons-attack-in-syria/a-38330217

 
I was trying to find out if it is plausible that the Syrian rebels could have sarin. The mainstream argument is that it would be too hard for the rebels to produce sarin, and it is a binary agent so Assad's explanation that Syria bombed a rebel chemical weapons factory doesn't hold up - it is unlikely that the rebels would have both components mixed in whatever facility was bombed.

The argument that it is too hard for the rebels to produce sarin might not be convincing if it was the rebels who used it in 2013 as some claim. I found some information that implies it was the rebels who used sarin in 2013 and other information saying they did not. So I am wondering if anyone knows of any sources they think are reliable that address that question?

References
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/05/middleeast/syria-sarin-chemical-weapons-explainer/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/05/middleeast/idlib-syria-attack/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghouta_chemical_attack#United_States
http://www.dw.com/en/is-assad-to-blame-for-the-chemical-weapons-attack-in-syria/a-38330217

https://www.rt.com/news/sarin-gas-turkey-al-nusra-021 video takes some time to buffer, supposedly proof of ISIS/Al Qaeda having sarin

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/6/syrian-rebels-used-sarin-nerve-gas-not-assads-regi/
Carla del Ponte, a member of the U.N. Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria, told Swiss TV there were “strong, concrete suspicions but not yet incontrovertible proof,” that rebels seeking to oust Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad had used the nerve agent.


Heres an article by Seymour Hersh on it, I wish he had linked his sources - https://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n24/seymour-m-hersh/whose-sarin


Sadly it looks like theres been another gas attack https://twitter.com/hashtag/qaboun?lang=en

EDIT: the RT video actually buffered so I revised my post.
 
Last edited:
Would you care to explain why inviting someone to discuss something via PM offends you so much?

David

David, I fear that you take things too seriously, LFI doesn't.

You should try it. I seriously found his one word reply to your post funny, I'm guessing that you didn't?
 
Your characterisation of events in Ukraine is misguided.

Watch this video of U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland brag to Exxon and Chevron executives about spending $5 BILLION U.S. Taxpayer dollars to overthrow the democratically elected government of Ukraine.

 
Back
Top