I would have been a little more socratic about it myself, but Alex's frontal assault did the job. Not that I don't feel for Ramsey; I've been there myself. Alex was actually a little too easy on him in some ways. For example, what is "Bible-based Christianity?" On one hand, what Protestant Christian would claim not to be "Bible based?" And if William is proudly wearing the label of Christian, who is giving him the right to basically excommunicate every single other person who also claimed that label over the last two millennia? Second, the whole idea of the Bible being the basis of Christianity is severely flawed. Where did the Bible come from? Even if you aren't accepting the Roman Josephus thing, and I remain agnostic on that, the Christian Church decided what the Bible was and what made the cut. This is illustrated beautifully by the fact that the canon is not the same across all denominations of Christianity. So if WR is claiming to be "biblically based," which Bible? Is it the one decided on by the Western (Catholic, by the way) Church? Lucky for him he just happened to be born in the West so he had the right scriptures! I kept waiting for him to come out with "It's not a religion, it's a relationship!"
It also made me angry that WR would not in the end defend his own BS. He conceded just about every substantive point Alex made, but without really conceding. That tells me he knows that he himself is full of it, but is unwilling to take the next logical step.
Let's also note that there are serious questions about the historicity of St. Paul himself. Check out Robert M. Price on that. Jesus too, but personally I think there had to be some living historical figure to whom all the lore became attached, and ultimately it doesn't matter anyway. Whether historical or not, Jesus (or Christ Consciousness, if you want) has been kicking ass and taking names for 2,000 years, and is very, very real where it counts.